Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34476717›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2021

Favipiravir treatment does not influence disease progression among adult patients hospitalized with moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a prospective, sequential cohort study from Hungary.

Balint Gergely Szabo, Katalin Szidonia Lenart, Borisz Petrik, Zsofia Gaspar, Noemi Kiss-Dala, Janos Szlavik, Istvan Valyi-Nagy, Botond Lakatos, Saint Ladislaus COVID-19 Collaborative

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Preparing for the next viral threat with broad-spectrum antivirals.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Balint Gergely Szabo *South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Saint Ladislaus Campus, H-1097 Albert Florian ut 5‑7., Budapest, Hungary. szabo.balint.gergely@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1775-1356
Katalin Szidonia Lenart *South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Saint Ladislaus Campus, H-1097 Albert Florian ut 5‑7., Budapest, Hungary.
Borisz PetrikFaculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Ulloi ut 26, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsofia GasparFaculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Ulloi ut 26, Budapest, Hungary.
Noemi Kiss-DalaSouth Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Saint Ladislaus Campus, H-1097 Albert Florian ut 5‑7., Budapest, Hungary.
Janos SzlavikSouth Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Saint Ladislaus Campus, H-1097 Albert Florian ut 5‑7., Budapest, Hungary.
Istvan Valyi-NagySouth Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Saint Ladislaus Campus, H-1097 Albert Florian ut 5‑7., Budapest, Hungary.
Botond LakatosSouth Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Saint Ladislaus Campus, H-1097 Albert Florian ut 5‑7., Budapest, Hungary.
Saint Ladislaus COVID-19 Collaborative
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data suggests that favipiravir (FVP) could be used against SARS-CoV-2. Our aim was to investigate the role of FVP in COVID-19 treatment. A prospective sequential cohort study was performed among adults hospitalized at our center between March and August 2020 with moderate-to-severe, PCR-confirmed COVID-19. For diagnosis and severity, ECDC and WHO definitions were utilized. Patients were screened for inclusion by a priori criteria and included in the FVP cohort if standard-of-care (SOC) + FVP or the non-FVP cohort if SOC ± other antivirals without FVP were administered for > 48 h from diagnosis. Treatment allocation was done per national guidelines, based on severity and drug availability. Primary endpoint was disease progression, a composite of 14-day all-cause death, need for mechanical ventilation, or immunomodulatory therapy. The impact of FVP exposure on disease progression was analyzed by binomial logistic regression. In all, 150 patients were included, 75 in each cohort. Disease progression (17/75, 22.7% vs. 10/75, 13.3%, p = 0.13), 14-day all-cause death (9/75, 12.0% vs. 10/75, 13.3%, p = 0.8), and need for mechanical ventilation (8/75, 10.7% vs. 4/75, 5.3%, p = 0.22) were similar, while immunomodulatory therapies were required more frequently among patients receiving FVP (10/75, 13.3% vs. 1/75, 1.3%, p < 0.01). The use of favipiravir was not retained as a protective factor against disease progression in multivatiate analysis. Time to antiviral therapy from PCR positivity, disease severity, need for oxygen supportation, and ICU admittance rates did not differ statistically between cohorts. In this study, favipiravir did not seem to positively affect disease progression.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAmidesCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionHumansHungaryProspective StudiesPyrazinesSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAmidesfavipiravirPyrazinesAntiviralCOVID-19FavipiravirSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34476717
PMCPMC8413073
OpenAlexW3197797010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.