ArticleClinical oral investigations2021
Effect of different activations of silver nanoparticle irrigants on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Active Oxygen Fluid (Blue®m) as a Root Canal Irrigant Against Enterococcus Faecalis.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2024Trial
- Impact XP-endo finisher on the 1-year follow-up success of posterior root canal treatments: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Trial
- Evaluation of bacterial reduction by contemporary irrigation activation methods against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in root canals.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of laser-assisted and passive ultrasonic irrigation methods in disinfection of post space and effects on bond strength of glass fiber posts to radicular dentin.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Irrigants Mixed with Silver Nanoparticles - AnJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Antibacterial efficacy of ultrasonically activated probiotic endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Enhancing Root Canal Disinfection with Er:YAG Laser: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Performance of chitosan nanoparticle-loaded irrigants on biofilm disruption.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Comparative Study ofNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Nanoarchitectonics-Based Materials as a Promising Strategy in the Treatment of Endodontic Infections.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Antibacterial biofilm efficacy of calcium hydroxide loaded on Gum Arabic nanocarrier: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Application of Nanomaterials in Endodontics.BME frontiers · 2024Review
- Photodynamic Suppression of Enterococcus Faecalis in Infected Root Canals with Indocyanine Green, TroloxPharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Chlorhexidine-Loaded Calcium Hydroxide-Based Intracanal Medications in Endo-Periodontal Lesions: An Ex Vivo and In Vitro Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Photothermal/Photoacoustic Therapy Combined with Metal-Based Nanomaterials for the Treatment of Microbial Infections.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Contemporary research trends on nanoparticles in endodontics: a bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2023Article
- Antibacterial effectiveness of multi-strain probiotics supernatants intracanal medication on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in a tooth model.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Silver Nanoparticles and Their Therapeutic Applications in Endodontics: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Surface characteristics and bacterial adhesion of endodontic cements.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) irrigating solution alone and following activation with photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), photodynamic therapy (PDT) with indocyanine green (ICG), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and manual dynamic activation (MDA) method for elimination of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) from the root canal system. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 59 extracted human single-rooted teeth were collected and prepared. E. faecalis was inoculated into the root canals and incubated for 4 weeks. The teeth were then randomly divided into five experimental groups (n = 10): the AN group, irrigation with AgNPs alone; the AN/ICG/DL group, irrigation with AgNPs and ICG, then activation with diode laser; the AN/PIPS group, irrigation with AgNPs and activation with 0.3 W Er: YAG laser; the AN/MDA group, irrigation with AgNPs and activation with tapered gutta-percha; and the AN/PUI group, irrigation with AgNPs and activation with ultrasonic. Also, two control groups of irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (n = 5) and no intervention (n = 4) were also used. Samples were collected from the dentinal chips before and after the intervention, and the percentage of reduction in colony count was calculated.
resultsA significant reduction in E. faecalis colony count was noted in all groups (P < 0.05). Maximum reduction in colony count was noted in AN/PIPS and AN/PUI groups by 91.03 and 91.29%, respectively. Minimum reduction was noted in the AN group alone.
conclusionActivation with PUI and PIPS enhanced the efficacy of AgNPs irrigating solution for elimination of E. faecalis from the root canal system. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: AgNPs activated by ultrasound or PIPS can be used as an adjunct for disinfection of the root canal system in endodontic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.