Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34476596›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Thermal effects of thulium: YAG laser treatment of the prostate-an in vitro study.

Simon Hein, Ralf Petzold, Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola, Martin Schoenthaler, Christian Gratzke, Arkadiusz Miernik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon HeinDepartment of Urology, Division of Urotechnology, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Ralf PetzoldDepartment of Urology, Division of Urotechnology, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Rodrigo Suarez-IbarrolaDepartment of Urology, Division of Urotechnology, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin SchoenthalerDepartment of Urology, Division of Urotechnology, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Christian GratzkeDepartment of Urology, Division of Urotechnology, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Arkadiusz MiernikDepartment of Urology, Division of Urotechnology, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany. arkadiusz.miernik@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-9647
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo objectively determine whether there is potential thermal tissue damage during Tm:YAG laser-based LUTS treatment.

methodsOur experimental model was comprised of a prostatic resection trainer placed in a 37 °C water bath. In a hollowed-out central area simulating the urethral lumen, we placed a RigiFib 800 fibre, irrigation inflow regulated with a digital pump, and a type K thermocouple. A second thermocouple was inserted 0.5/1 cm adjacently and protected with an aluminum barrier to prevent it from urethral fluid. We investigated continuous and intermittent 120 W and 80 W laser application with various irrigation rates in eight measurement sessions lasting up to 14 min. Thermal measurements were recorded continuously and in real-time using MatLab. All experiments were repeated five times to balance out variations.

resultsContinuous laser application at 120 W and 125 ml/min caused a urethral ∆T of ~ 15 K and a parenchymal temperature increase of up to 7 K. With 50 ml/min irrigation, a urethral and parenchymal ∆T of 30 K and 15 K were reached, respectively. Subsequently and in absence of laser application, prostatic parenchyma needed over 16 min to reach baseline body temperature. At 80 W lower temperature increases were reached compared to similar irrigation but higher power.

conclusionsWe showed that potentially harming temperatures can be reached, especially during high laser power and low irrigation. The heat generation can also be conveyed to the prostate parenchyma and deeper structures, potentially affecting the neurovascular bundles. Further clinical studies with intracorporal temperature measurement are necessary to further investigate this potentially harming surgical adverse effect.

Indexed as

ProstateHot TemperatureHumansLasers, Solid-StateMaleModels, TheoreticalProstatectomyThermal effectThulium:YAGTm:YAG laser enucleation (ThuLEP)Tm:YAG laser vaporization (ThuVEP)

Identifiers

PMID34476596
PMCPMC8813676
OpenAlexW3196296598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.