Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34476540›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2022

Detecting hip osteoarthritis on clinical CT: a deep learning application based on 2-D summation images derived from CT.

R K Gebre, J Hirvasniemi, R A van der Heijden, I Lantto, S Saarakkala, J Leppilahti, T Jämsä

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R K GebreResearch Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. robel.gebre@oulu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5746-0994
J HirvasniemiDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
R A van der HeijdenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
I LanttoDivision of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
S SaarakkalaResearch Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
J LeppilahtiDivision of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
T JämsäResearch Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Oulu University Hospital · FIErasmus MC · NL

Funding

EP-Nuffic NICHE/ETH/246 through CINOP Global
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed and compared deep learning models to detect hip osteoarthritis on clinical CT. The CT-based summation images, CT-AP, that resemble X-ray radiographs can detect radiographic hip osteoarthritis and in the absence of large training data, a reliable deep learning model can be optimized by combining CT-AP and X-ray images.

introductionIn this study, we aimed to investigate the applicability of deep learning (DL) to assess radiographic hip osteoarthritis (rHOA) on computed tomography (CT).

methodsThe study data consisted of 94 abdominopelvic clinical CTs and 5659 hip X-ray images collected from Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK). The CT slices were sequentially summed to create radiograph-like 2-D images named CT-AP. X-ray and CT-AP images were classified as rHOA if they had osteoarthritic changes corresponding to Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or higher. The study data was split into 55% training, 30% validation, and 15% test sets. A pretrained ResNet18 was optimized for a classification task of rHOA vs. no-rHOA. Five models were trained using (1) X-rays, (2) downsampled X-rays, (3) combination of CT-AP and X-ray images, (4) combination of CT-AP and downsampled X-ray images, and (5) CT-AP images.

resultsAmongst the five models, Model-3 and Model-5 performed best in detecting rHOA from the CT-AP images. Model-3 detected rHOA on the test set of CT-AP images with a balanced accuracy of 82.2% and was able to discriminate rHOA from no-rHOA with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.93 [0.75-0.99]. Model-5 detected rHOA on the test set at a balanced accuracy of 82.2% and classified rHOA from no-rHOA with an ROC AUC of 0.89 [0.67-0.97].

conclusionCT-based summation images that resemble radiographs can be used to detect rHOA. In addition, in the absence of large training data, a reliable DL model can be optimized by combining CT-AP and X-ray images.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOsteoarthritis, HipHumansRadiographyRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTomography, X-Ray ComputedClassificationComputed tomographyDeep learningHip osteoarthritisRadiology

Identifiers

PMID34476540
PMCPMC8813821
OpenAlexW3196803718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.