Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34476531›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2021

Preclinical evaluation of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin as an effective radiosensitizer in chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer.

Jenny Ling-Yu Chen, Chun-Kai Pan, Yu-Li Lin, Ching-Yi Tsai, Yu-Sen Huang, Wen-Chi Yang, Feng-Ming Hsu, Sung-Hsin Kuo, Ming-Jium Shieh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Liposomal DoxorubicinCurrent drug delivery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The use of radiosensitizing agents in the therapy of glioblastoma multiforme-a comprehensive review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jenny Ling-Yu ChenDepartment of Radiology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 1, Section 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chun-Kai PanDepartment of Radiology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 1, Section 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Li LinDepartment of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, 100, Taipei, Taiwan. linyuli888@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6287-3646
Ching-Yi TsaiDepartment of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, 100, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Sen HuangDepartment of Radiology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 1, Section 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Chi YangDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
Feng-Ming HsuDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sung-Hsin KuoDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Jium ShiehInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Section 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Taiwan Ocean University · TWNational Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDevelopment of a safe and effective systemic chemotherapeutic agent for concurrent administration with definitive thoracic radiotherapy remains a major goal of lung cancer management. The synergistic effect of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin and irradiation was evaluated in lung cancer cell lines both in vitro and in vivo.

methodsIn vitro radiosensitization of A549 and LLC cell lines was evaluated by colony formation assay, γH2AX fluorescent staining and western blot assay, and annexin V staining. A radiosensitization study with healthy human lung-derived cell line BEAS-2B was performed for comparative purposes. In vivo radiosensitization was evaluated by tumor ectopic growth, cell survival, pharmacokinetics, and biodistribution analyses. Cleaved caspase‑3, the marker for apoptosis, was assessed immunohistochemically in A549 xenograft tumors.

resultsTreatment with PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin decreased A549 and LLC cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. In vitro studies revealed comparable radiosensitizer advantages of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin and free doxorubicin, showing equivalent DNA double-strand breaks according to γH2AX fluorescent staining and western blot assays, similar numbers of apoptotic cells in the annexin‑V staining assay, and moderately decreased clonogenic survival. In vivo studies demonstrated markedly slow ectopic tumor growth with prolonged survival following treatment with PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin plus irradiation in both A549 and LLC mouse models, suggesting that PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin is more effective as a radiosensitizer than free doxorubicin in vivo. Pharmacokinetics evaluation showed a longer half-life of approximately 40 h for PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin, confirming that the liposomal carrier achieved controlled release. Biodistribution evaluation of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin confirmed high accumulation of doxorubicin in tumors, indicating the promising drug delivery attributes of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin. Although free doxorubicin caused histopathologic myocarditis with the cardiac muscle fibers showing varying degrees of damage, PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin caused no such effects. The immunohistochemical expression of cleaved caspase-3-positive cells was greatest expressed in the irradiation and PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin combined treatment group, indicating prolonged tumoricidal effects.

conclusionsOur study provides preclinical in vitro and in vivo evidence of the effectiveness of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin as a radiosensitizer, supporting its potential clinical development as a component of chemoradiotherapy.

Indexed as

DoxorubicinLung NeoplasmsAnimalsChemoradiotherapyHumansMicePolyethylene GlycolsTissue DistributionDoxorubicinliposomal doxorubicinPolyethylene GlycolsAntitumor effectApoptosisMouse modelNeoplasmRadiosensitization

Identifiers

PMID34476531
OpenAlexW3197185034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.