Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34476404›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2021

Plasma Exchange in Patients With Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Single-Center Experience.

Christian Nusshag, Christian Morath, Claudius Speer, Florian Kaelble, Martin Zeier, Monica Boxberger, Elisa Schulze-Schleithoff, Mascha O Fiedler, Markus A Weigand, Uta Merle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christian NusshagDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian MorathDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Claudius SpeerDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Florian KaelbleDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin ZeierDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Monica BoxbergerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Elisa Schulze-SchleithoffDepartment of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mascha O FiedlerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus A WeigandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Uta MerleDepartment of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceRecent evidence suggests a multilevel inflammatory syndrome as a driving factor in some of the most severely ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients with overlapping features to other hyperinflammatory or autoimmune diseases. Therefore, plasma exchange is considered as potential therapy in these patients.

objectivesWe characterize the longitudinal therapeutic efficacy and safety profile of plasma exchange in critically ill patients with clinical and laboratory evidences of coronavirus disease 2019-related immunopathology. DESIGN SETTING AND

participantsA retropsective case-control study of critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients treated with plasma exchange at Heidelberg University Hospital between March and December 2020. Plasma exchange-treated patients were compared with coronavirus disease 2019 patients on standard therapy matched for age, gender, disease severity, and features of hyperinflammatory syndrome. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Mortality rate and course of clinical and laboratory parameters in response to plasma exchange were assessed in coronavirus disease 2019 patients and in patients on standard care. A plasma volume of 50 mL per kg body weight or a maximum of 4 L was exchanged.

resultsIn total, 28 critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients were treated with a median of three plasma exchange procedures per patient. No relevant complications occurred during plasma exchange therapy. Inflammatory and biochemical markers of end-organ damage and endothelial activation were significantly reduced following plasma exchange together with normalization of body temperature, improved pulmonary function, and reduced vasopressor demand. Most importantly, these improvements were maintained after the last plasma exchange. In contrast, no such effects were observed in the control group, although baseline clinical and laboratory parameters were comparable. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed improved 30-day survival in the plasma exchange group compared with the control group (67.9% vs 42.9%; CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our data provide further evidence for plasma exchange as a novel therapeutic strategy in a subset of critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients by potentially reversing the complex coronavirus disease 2019 immunopathology. Randomized controlled trials are underway to confirm these positive results.

Indexed as

coronavirus disease 2019dysregulated immune responsehyperinflammatory syndromeplasma exchangerescue therapy

Identifiers

PMID34476404
PMCPMC8382335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.