Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34476126›Full record

ReviewNeurology. Clinical practice2021

Multiple Sclerosis Phenotypes as a Continuum: The Role of Neurologic Reserve.

Timothy L Vollmer, Kavita V Nair, Ian M Williams, Enrique Alvarez

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy L VollmerDepartment of Neurology (TLV, KVN, EA), University of Colorado, and Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, Aurora; Department of Clinical Pharmacy (KVN), Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; and Oxford PharmaGenesis (IMW), United Kingdom.
Kavita V NairDepartment of Neurology (TLV, KVN, EA), University of Colorado, and Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, Aurora; Department of Clinical Pharmacy (KVN), Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; and Oxford PharmaGenesis (IMW), United Kingdom.
Ian M WilliamsDepartment of Neurology (TLV, KVN, EA), University of Colorado, and Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, Aurora; Department of Clinical Pharmacy (KVN), Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; and Oxford PharmaGenesis (IMW), United Kingdom.
Enrique AlvarezDepartment of Neurology (TLV, KVN, EA), University of Colorado, and Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, Aurora; Department of Clinical Pharmacy (KVN), Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; and Oxford PharmaGenesis (IMW), United Kingdom.
Rocky Mountain MS Center · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review presents the hypothesis that loss of neurologic reserve explains onset of progressive multiple sclerosis (PrMS). RECENT

findingsEvidence supporting the separate classification of PrMS and relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is limited and does not explain PrMS or the response of these patients to therapy. SUMMARY: We argue that multiple sclerosis (MS) progresses along a continuum from RMS to PrMS, with differing levels of neurologic reserve accounting for phenotypic differences. In early MS, inflammation causes brain atrophy with symptoms buffered by neurologic reserve. As brain loss from normal aging and MS continues, reserve is depleted and effects of subclinical MS disease activity and aging are unmasked, manifesting as PrMS. Most therapies show limited benefit in PrMS; patients are older, have fewer inflammatory events, and the effects of aging cause continued loss of neurologic function, even if inflammation is terminated. Loss of neurologic reserve means patients with PrMS cannot recover function, unlike patients with RMS.

Identifiers

PMID34476126
PMCPMC8382415
OpenAlexW3127250794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.