Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34475930›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Efficacy analysis of combined detection of 5 Serological Tumor markers including MIF and PIVKA-II for early diagnosis of Primary Hepatic Cancer.

Li Huan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Li HuanLi Huan Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, 063000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the efficacy of combined detection of 5 serological tumor markers including macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and abnormal prothrombin (PIVKA-II) in the early diagnosis of primary liver cancer.

methodsA total of 90 patients with suspected primary liver cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to May 2017 were selected as the research subjects. All patients were examined by imaging and histopathology. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect serum MIF, GP73 and PIVKA-II. Automatic electrochemiluminescence immunoassay system was used to detect serum AFP and AFP-L3. The diagnostic value of single and combined detection of five serological tumor markers for primary liver cancer was compared and analyzed.

resultsOf the 90 suspected patients with primary liver cancer, thirty-seven were excluded and 53 were confirmed. From serum MIF diagnosis, fifty-three patients had positive results for primary liver cancer, of which eight had false positive results, with a sensitivity of 84.91%, a specificity of 78.38%, and an accuracy of 82.22%, respectively. From serum GP73 diagnosis, fifty-six patients had positive results for primary liver cancer, of which 10 had false positive results, with a sensitivity of 86.79%, a specificity of 72.97%, and an accuracy of 81.11%, respectively. From serum PIVKA-II diagnosis, 48 patients had positive results for primary liver cancer, of which seven had false positive results, with the sensitivity of 77.36%, the specificity of 81.08%, and the accuracy of 78.89%, respectively. From serum AFP-L3 diagnosis, fifty-two patients had positive results for primary liver cancer, of which nine had false positive results, with a sensitivity of 81.13%, a specificity of 75.68%, and an accuracy of 78.89% respectively. From serum AFP diagnosis, 57 patients had positive results for primary liver cancer, of which seven had false positive results, with a sensitivity of 83.02%, the specificity of 81.08%, and an accuracy of 82.22%, respectively. From the combined diagnosis of 5 serological tumor markers, fifty-three patients had positive results for primary liver cancer, of which one had a false positive result, with a sensitivity of 98.11%, a specificity of 97.30%, and an accuracy of 97.78%, respectively. Combined diagnosis has significantly higher sensitivity, specificity and accuracy than a single diagnosis (P<0.05).

conclusionSerum MIF, GP73, PIVKA-II, AFP-L3 and AFP all have certain diagnostic value for primary liver cancer; the combined detection of five serological tumor markers can significantly improve the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the diagnosis of primary liver cancer, with higher diagnostic value.

Indexed as

Abnormal prothrombinAFPAFP-13GP 73MIFPrimary liver cancer

Identifiers

PMID34475930
PMCPMC8377914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.