Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34475863›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Integrated Bacterial and Fungal Diversity Analysis Reveals the Gut Microbial Alterations in Diarrheic Giraffes.

Aoyun Li, Bingxian Liu, Feiran Li, Yuanyuan He, Lei Wang, Muhammad Fakhar-E-Alam Kulyar, Huade Li, Yuhang Fu, Huaisen Zhu, Yaping Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Environmental Microplastic Exposure Changes Gut Microbiota in Chickens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparative analysis of the intestinal microbiota of black-necked cranes (Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aoyun LiHubei Three Gorges Polytechnic, Yichang, China.
Bingxian LiuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Feiran LiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yuanyuan HeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Lei WangAnimal Husbandry Station of Bijie City, Bijie, China.
Muhammad Fakhar-E-Alam KulyarCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Huade LiSichuan Academy of Grassland Science, Chengdu, China.
Yuhang FuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Huaisen ZhuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yaping WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Xiong JiangHubei Three Gorges Polytechnic, Yichang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota has been demonstrated to be associated with multiple gastrointestinal diseases, but information regarding the gut microbial alternations in diarrheic giraffe remains scarce. Here, 16S rDNA and ITS gene amplicon sequencing were conducted to investigate the gut microbial composition and variability in diarrheic giraffes. Results demonstrated that

Indexed as

16S rDNAdiarrheagiraffegut microbiotaITS

Identifiers

PMID34475863
PMCPMC8406688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.