ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
Training Emotion Recognition Accuracy: Results for Multimodal Expressions and Facial Micro Expressions.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emotion Recognition Accuracy Among Individuals With ADHD: A Systematic Review.Journal of attention disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Spatiotemporal multimodal emotion recognition using Temporal video sequences and pose features for child emotion classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Feasibility of internet-based multimodal emotion recognition training in adolescents with and without autism: A pilot study.Internet interventions · 2025Review
- An open label pilot study of micro expression recognition training as an intervention for low mood.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- On the Role of Sensorimotor Experience in Facial Expression Perception.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024Review
- Estrogen predicts multimodal emotion recognition accuracy across the menstrual cycle.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Emotion recognition accuracy only weakly predicts empathic accuracy in a standard paradigm and in real life interactions.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Article
- Trainee psychotherapists' emotion recognition accuracy improves after training: emotion recognition training as a tool for psychotherapy education.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- An ingroup disadvantage in recognizing micro-expressions.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Oxytocin Impairs the Recognition of Micro-Expressions of Surprise and Disgust.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Training Humans to Detect Children's Lies Through Their Facial Expressions.Applied cognitive psychologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonverbal emotion recognition accuracy (ERA) is a central feature of successful communication and interaction, and is of importance for many professions. We developed and evaluated two ERA training programs-one focusing on dynamic multimodal expressions (audio, video, audio-video) and one focusing on facial micro expressions. Sixty-seven subjects were randomized to one of two experimental groups (multimodal, micro expression) or an active control group (emotional working memory task). Participants trained once weekly with a brief computerized training program for three consecutive weeks. Pre-post outcome measures consisted of a multimodal ERA task, a micro expression recognition task, and a task about patients' emotional cues. Post measurement took place approximately a week after the last training session. Non-parametric mixed analyses of variance using the Aligned Rank Transform were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the training programs. Results showed that multimodal training was significantly more effective in improving multimodal ERA compared to micro expression training or the control training; and the micro expression training was significantly more effective in improving micro expression ERA compared to the other two training conditions. Both pre-post effects can be interpreted as large. No group differences were found for the outcome measure about recognizing patients' emotion cues. There were no transfer effects of the training programs, meaning that participants only improved significantly for the specific facet of ERA that they had trained on. Further, low baseline ERA was associated with larger ERA improvements. Results are discussed with regard to methodological and conceptual aspects, and practical implications and future directions are explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.