Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34475501›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Effectiveness of the natural resistance management refuge for Bt-cotton is dominated by local abundance of soybean and maize.

Benjamin Arends, Dominic D Reisig, Shawnee Gundry, Anders S Huseth, Francis P F Reay-Jones, Jeremy K Greene, George G Kennedy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin ArendsDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7630, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7630, USA.
Dominic D ReisigDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Vernon James Research and Extension Station, 207 Research Station Rd., Plymouth, NC, 27692, USA.
Shawnee GundryDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7630, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7630, USA.
Anders S HusethDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7630, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7630, USA.
Francis P F Reay-JonesDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Pee Dee Research and Education Center, 2200 Pocket Road, Florence, SC, 29506, USA.
Jeremy K GreeneDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Edisto Research and Education Center, 64 Research Road, Blackville, SC, 29817, USA.
George G KennedyDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7630, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7630, USA. gkennedy@ncsu.edu.
North Carolina State University · USClemson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically engineered crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry toxins have transformed insect management in maize and cotton, reducing insecticide use and associated off-target effects. To mitigate the risk that pests evolve resistance to Bt crops, the US Environmental Protection Agency requires resistance management measures. The approved resistance management plan for Bt maize in cotton production regions requires a structured refuge of non-Bt maize equal to 20% of the maize planted; that for Bt cotton relies on the presence of an unstructured natural refuge comprising both non-Bt crop and non-crop hosts. We examined how abundance of Bt crops (cotton and maize) and an important non-Bt crop (soybean) component of the natural refuge affect resistance to Bt Cry1Ac toxin in local populations of Helicoverpa zea, an important lepidopteran pest impacted by Bt cotton and maize. We show refuge effectiveness is responsive to local abundances of maize and cotton and non-Bt soybean, and maize, in its role as a source of H. zea infesting cotton and non-Bt hosts, influences refuge effectiveness. These findings have important implications for commercial and regulatory decisions regarding deployment of Bt toxins targeting H. zea in maize, cotton, and other crops and for assumptions regarding efficacy of natural refuges.

Identifiers

PMID34475501
PMCPMC8413434
OpenAlexW3198096475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.