Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34475363›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2021

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Urogenital and Extragenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea and Enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 2018 to 2019.

Laura A S Quilter, Sancta B St Cyr, Jaeyoung Hong, Lenore Asbel, Ilene Bautista, Bonnie Carter, Yanick Casimir, Michael Denny, Melissa Ervin, Raquel Gomez and 21 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Establishing aMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tetracycline-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Correlates ofBMJ open · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

Laura A S Quilter
Sancta B St CyrDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Jaeyoung HongDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Lenore AsbelPhiladelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA.
Ilene BautistaSouthern Nevada Health District, Las Vegas, NV.
Bonnie CarterOakland County Health Division, Pontiac, MI.
Yanick CasimirMiami-Dade County Department of Health, Miami, FL.
Michael DennyHawaii State Department of Health, Honolulu, HI.
Melissa ErvinColumbus Health Department, Columbus, OH.
Raquel GomezMilwaukee Health Department, Milwaukee, WI.
Alesia HarveyDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Justin L Holderman
Kimberly JohnsonNew York City Department of Mental Health and Hygiene, New York City, NY.
Robert P KohnSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA.
Emily R LearnerDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Kerry MaukDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Timothy MenzaOregon Health Authority, Portland, OR.
Christie MettenbrinkDenver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO.
William D Nettleton
Karen R NicosiaOhio Department of Health, Columbus, OH.
Cau D PhamDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Christopher RiedOrange County Health Care Agency, Santa Ana, CA.
Karen SchlangerDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Annah SchneiderMinnesota Department of Health, St Paul, MN.
Olusegun O SogeUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Irina TabidzeChicago Department of Public Health, Chicago, IL.
Stephanie N TaylorLouisiana Office of Public Health, New Orleans, LA.
Winston TilghmanCounty of San Diego Health & Human Services Agency, San Diego, CA.
Cindy TolerGuilford County Public Health, Greensboro, NC.
Hillard WeinstockDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Elizabeth A TorroneDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USOhio Department of Health · USChicago Department of Public Health · USGuilford County Schools · USHealth and Human Services Agency · USMiami Dade College · USMilwaukee Health Department · USMinnesota Department of Health · USNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene · USOrange County Healthcare Agency · USOregon Health Authority · USPhiladelphia Department of Public Health · USSan Francisco Department of Public Health · USSouthern Nevada Health District · USTrinity Health Oakland Hospital · USUnited States Department of State · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated differences in gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility by anatomic site among cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) using specimens collected through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project and Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea.

methodsDuring the period January 1, 2018-December 31, 2019, 12 enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project and 8 Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea sites collected urogenital, pharyngeal, and rectal isolates from cisgender MSM in sexually transmitted disease clinics. Gonococcal isolates were sent to regional laboratories for antimicrobial susceptibility testing by agar dilution. To account for correlated observations, linear mixed-effects models were used to calculate geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), and mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to calculate the proportion of isolates with elevated or resistant MICs; comparisons were made across anatomic sites.

resultsParticipating clinics collected 3974 urethral, 1553 rectal, and 1049 pharyngeal isolates from 5456 unique cisgender MSM. There were no significant differences in the geometric mean MICs for azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline by anatomic site. For cefixime and ceftriaxone, geometric mean MICs for pharyngeal isolates were higher compared with anogenital isolates (P < 0.05). The proportion of isolates with elevated ceftriaxone MICs (≥0.125 μg/mL) at the pharynx (0.67%) was higher than at rectal (0.13%) and urethral (0.18%) sites (P < 0.05).

conclusionsBased on data collected from multijurisdictional sentinel surveillance projects, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates may differ among MSM at extragenital sites, particularly at the pharynx. Continued investigation into gonococcal susceptibility patterns by anatomic site may be an important strategy to monitor and detect the emergence of antimicrobial resistant gonorrhea over time.

Indexed as

GonorrheaSexual and Gender MinoritiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinDrug Resistance, BacterialHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNeisseria gonorrhoeaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacin

Identifiers

PMID34475363
PMCPMC11287478
OpenAlexW3198125141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.