ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2021
Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Useful experimental aspects of small-wedge synchrotron crystallography for accurate structure analysis of protein molecules.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025Article
- Guide to serial synchrotron crystallography.Current research in structural biology · 2024Review
- Elucidating polymorphs of crystal structures by intensity-based hierarchical clustering analysis of multiple diffraction data sets.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023Article
- In situ crystal data-collection and ligand-screening system at SPring-8.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2022Article
- Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection. Corrigendum.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2022Article
- Radiation damage to biological samples: still a pertinent issue.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intense micro-focus X-ray beamlines available at synchrotron facilities have achieved high-quality data collection even from the microcrystals of membrane proteins. The automatic data collection system developed at SPring-8, named ZOO, has contributed to many structure determinations of membrane proteins using small-wedge synchrotron crystallography (SWSX) datasets. The `small-wedge' (5-20°) datasets are collected from multiple crystals and then merged to obtain the final structure factors. To our knowledge, no systematic investigation on the dose dependence of data accuracy has so far been reported for SWSX, which is between `serial crystallography' and `rotation crystallography'. Thus, herein, we investigated the optimal dose conditions for experimental phasing with SWSX. Phase determination using anomalous scattering signals was found to be more difficult at higher doses. Furthermore, merging more homogeneous datasets grouped by hierarchical clustering with controlled doses mildly reduced the negative factors in data collection, such as `lack of signal' and `radiation damage'. In turn, as more datasets were merged, more probable phases could be obtained across a wider range of doses. Therefore, our findings show that it is essential to choose a lower dose than 10 MGy for de novo structure determination by SWSX. In particular, data collection using a dose of 5 MGy proved to be optimal in balancing the amount of signal available while reducing the amount of damage as much as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.