Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34475278›Full record

ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2021

Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection.

Seiki Baba, Hiroaki Matsuura, Takashi Kawamura, Naoki Sakai, Yuki Nakamura, Yoshiaki Kawano, Nobuhiro Mizuno, Takashi Kumasaka, Masaki Yamamoto, Kunio Hirata

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Guide to serial synchrotron crystallography.Current research in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. In situ crystal data-collection and ligand-screening system at SPring-8.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Seiki BabaProtein Crystal Analysis Division, Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2589-232X
Hiroaki MatsuuraLife Science Research Infrastructure Group, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-Cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8778-7955
Takashi KawamuraProtein Crystal Analysis Division, Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan.
Naoki SakaiLife Science Research Infrastructure Group, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-Cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8544-1187
Yuki NakamuraProtein Crystal Analysis Division, Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan.
Yoshiaki KawanoLife Science Research Infrastructure Group, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-Cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3264-3783
Nobuhiro MizunoProtein Crystal Analysis Division, Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan.
Takashi KumasakaProtein Crystal Analysis Division, Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9289-1557
Masaki YamamotoLife Science Research Infrastructure Group, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-Cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1311-1768
Kunio HirataLife Science Research Infrastructure Group, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-Cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1491-6509

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP20am0101070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intense micro-focus X-ray beamlines available at synchrotron facilities have achieved high-quality data collection even from the microcrystals of membrane proteins. The automatic data collection system developed at SPring-8, named ZOO, has contributed to many structure determinations of membrane proteins using small-wedge synchrotron crystallography (SWSX) datasets. The `small-wedge' (5-20°) datasets are collected from multiple crystals and then merged to obtain the final structure factors. To our knowledge, no systematic investigation on the dose dependence of data accuracy has so far been reported for SWSX, which is between `serial crystallography' and `rotation crystallography'. Thus, herein, we investigated the optimal dose conditions for experimental phasing with SWSX. Phase determination using anomalous scattering signals was found to be more difficult at higher doses. Furthermore, merging more homogeneous datasets grouped by hierarchical clustering with controlled doses mildly reduced the negative factors in data collection, such as `lack of signal' and `radiation damage'. In turn, as more datasets were merged, more probable phases could be obtained across a wider range of doses. Therefore, our findings show that it is essential to choose a lower dose than 10 MGy for de novo structure determination by SWSX. In particular, data collection using a dose of 5 MGy proved to be optimal in balancing the amount of signal available while reducing the amount of damage as much as possible.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularMuramidaseRadiation DosageRadiation InjuriesScattering, RadiationSynchrotronsMembrane ProteinsMuramidasede novo phasingdoseprotein crystallographyradiation damagesmall-wedge synchrotron crystallography (SWSX)

Identifiers

PMID34475278
PMCPMC8415328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.