Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34475265›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Perirhinal and Postrhinal Damage Have Different Consequences on Attention as Assessed in the Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task.

Sean G Trettel, Kara L Agster, Rebecca D Burwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean G TrettelDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912 rebecca_burwell@brown.edu sean_trettel@brown.edu.
Kara L AgsterDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912.
Rebecca D BurwellDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912 rebecca_burwell@brown.edu sean_trettel@brown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2063-9616

Funding

Circuit analysis of corticohippocampal interactions in memoryR01MH108729 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BURWELL, REBECCA D. · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Investigating the functional role of the pulvinar-postrhinal circuit in visuospatial attentionF32EY031561 · NEI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI TRETTEL, SEAN GREGORY · 2020 to 2022
$206k
Postrhinal cortex and attentional functionsF31MH072144 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI AGSTER, KARA L · 2005 to 2006
$54k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY031561NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH072144NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perirhinal (PER) and postrhinal (POR) cortices, structures in the medial temporal lobe, are implicated in learning and memory. The PER is understood to process object information and the POR to process spatial or contextual information. Whether the medial temporal lobe is dedicated to memory, however, is under debate. In this study, we addressed the hypothesis that the PER and POR are also involved in non-mnemonic cognitive functions. Rats with PER or POR damage and SHAM surgical controls were shaped, trained, and tested on the five-choice serial reaction time (5CSRT) task, which assesses attention and executive function. Rats with PER damage were impaired in acquiring the task and at asymptote, although processing information about objects was not relevant to the task. When confronted with attentional challenges, rats with PER damage showed a pattern consistent with decreased attentional capacity, increased response errors, and increased impulsive behavior. Rats with POR damage showed intact acquisition and normal asymptotic performance. They also exhibited faster latencies in the absence of speed accuracy trade-off suggesting enhanced response readiness. We suggest this increased response readiness results from decreased automatic monitoring of the local environment, which might normally compete with response readiness. Our findings are consistent with a role for PER in controlled attention and a role for POR in stimulus-driven attention providing evidence that the PER and POR cortices have functions that go beyond memory for objects and memory for scenes and contexts, respectively. These findings provide new evidence for functional specialization in the medial temporal lobe.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexTemporal LobeAnimalsCognitionLearningRatsReaction Timeexecutive functionhippocampusmedial temporal lobememoryparahippocampalserial reaction time

Identifiers

PMID34475265
PMCPMC8462067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.