Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34475217›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Energy penalties enhance flexible receptor docking in a model cavity.

Anna S Kamenik, Isha Singh, Parnian Lak, Trent E Balius, Klaus R Liedl, Brian K Shoichet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. From AI-AssistedPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Art and Science of Molecular Docking.Annual review of biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Considerations Around Structure-Based Drug Discovery for KRAS Using DOCK.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Cucurbit[7]uril Enhances Distance Measurements of Spin-Labeled Proteins.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna S KamenikInstitute of General, Inorganic, and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8657-0036
Isha SinghDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158.
Parnian LakDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158.
Trent E BaliusDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158 bshoichet@gmail.com Klaus.Liedl@uibk.ac.at trent.balius@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-6811-4667
Klaus R LiedlInstitute of General, Inorganic, and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; bshoichet@gmail.com Klaus.Liedl@uibk.ac.at trent.balius@nih.gov.
Brian K ShoichetDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158 bshoichet@gmail.com Klaus.Liedl@uibk.ac.at trent.balius@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-6098-7367

Funding

Development and Testing of New Computational Methods for Ligand Discovery and MechanismR35GM122481 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Brian K Shoichet · 2017 to 2026
$8.5M
Austrian Science Fund FWF P 30737NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein flexibility remains a major challenge in library docking because of difficulties in sampling conformational ensembles with accurate probabilities. Here, we use the model cavity site of T4 lysozyme L99A to test flexible receptor docking with energy penalties from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Crystallography with larger and smaller ligands indicates that this cavity can adopt three major conformations: open, intermediate, and closed. Since smaller ligands typically bind better to the cavity site, we anticipate an energy penalty for the cavity opening. To estimate its magnitude, we calculate conformational preferences from MD simulations. We find that including a penalty term is essential for retrospective ligand enrichment; otherwise, high-energy states dominate the docking. We then prospectively docked a library of over 900,000 compounds for new molecules binding to each conformational state. Absent a penalty term, the open conformation dominated the docking results; inclusion of this term led to a balanced sampling of ligands against each state. High ranked molecules were experimentally tested by T

Indexed as

Binding SitesCrystallography, X-RayKineticsLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsRetrospective StudiesThermodynamicsLigandsProteinsdockingflexible receptormodel cavitymolecular dynamics

Identifiers

PMID34475217
PMCPMC8433570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.