Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34475176›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol.

Chloe Clifford Astbury, Elizabeth McGill, Matt Egan, Tarra L Penney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chloe Clifford AstburyGlobal Food System and Policy Research, School of Global Health, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-7833
Elizabeth McGillDeaprtment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3841-8467
Matt EganDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Tarra L PenneyGlobal Food System and Policy Research, School of Global Health, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada tpenney@yorku.ca.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGiven the complex causal origins of many non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and the complex landscapes in which policies designed to tackle them are made and unfold, the need for systems thinking and complexity science (STCS) in developing effective policy solutions has been emphasised. While numerous methods informed by STCS have been applied to the policy process in NCD prevention, these applications have not been systematically catalogued. The aim of this scoping review is to identify existing applications of methods informed by STCS to the policy process for NCD prevention, documenting which domains of the policy process they have been applied to. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic scoping review methodology will be used. IDENTIFICATION: We will search Medline, SCOPUS, Embase and Web of Science using search terms combining STCS, NCD prevention and the policy process. All records published in English will be eligible for inclusion, regardless of study design. SELECTION: We will screen titles and abstracts and extract data according to published guidelines for scoping reviews. In order to determine the quality of the included studies, we will use the approach developed by Dixon-Woods SYNTHESIS: We will identify relevant studies, summarising key data from each study and mapping applications of methods informed by STCS to different parts of the policy process. Review findings will provide a useful reference for policy-makers, outlining which domains of the policy process different methods have been applied to. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as the study does not involve primary data collection. The findings of this study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, presentations and summaries for key stakeholders.

Indexed as

Noncommunicable DiseasesDelivery of Health CareHumansPolicyResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicSystems Analysishealth policypublic healthstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34475176
PMCPMC8413942
OpenAlexW3197021812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.