Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34475175›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2021

Integrated Measurement for Early Detection (MIDO) as a digital strategy for timely assessment of non-communicable disease profiles and factors associated with unawareness and control: a retrospective observational study in primary healthcare facilities in Mexico.

Héctor Gallardo-Rincón, Alejandra Montoya, Rodrigo Saucedo-Martínez, Ricardo Mújica-Rosales, Lorena Suárez-Idueta, Luis Alberto Martínez-Juárez, Christian Razo, Rafael Lozano, Roberto Tapia-Conyer

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Héctor Gallardo-RincónHealth Sciences University Center (CUCS-UdeG), University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.
Alejandra MontoyaCarlos Slim Foundation, México City, Mexico airainmr@fundacioncarlosslim.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9466-8452
Rodrigo Saucedo-MartínezCarlos Slim Foundation, México City, Mexico.
Ricardo Mújica-RosalesCarlos Slim Foundation, México City, Mexico.
Lorena Suárez-IduetaCarlos Slim Foundation, México City, Mexico.
Luis Alberto Martínez-JuárezCarlos Slim Foundation, México City, Mexico.
Christian RazoInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Rafael LozanoInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Roberto Tapia-ConyerCarlos Slim Foundation, México City, Mexico.
University of Washington · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMexfam · MXUniversidad de Guadalajara · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Carlos Slim Foundation implemented the Integrated Measurement for Early Detection (MIDO), a screening strategy for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Mexico as part of CASALUD, a portfolio of digital health services focusing on healthcare delivery and prevention/management of NCDs. We investigated the disease profile of the screened population and evaluated MIDO's contribution to the continuum of care of the main NCDs.

designUsing data from MIDO and the chronic diseases information system, we quantified the proportion of the population screened and diagnosed with NCDs, and measured care linkage/retention and level of control achieved. We analysed comorbidity patterns and estimated prevalence of predisease stages. Finally, we estimated characteristics associated with unawareness and control of NCDs, and examined efficacy of the CASALUD model in improving NCD control.

settingPublic primary health centres in 27/32 Mexican states.

participantsIndividuals aged ≥20 years lacking healthcare access.

resultsFrom 2014 to 2018, 743 000 individuals were screened using MIDO. A predisease or disease condition was detected in ≥70% of the population who were unaware of their NCD status. The screening identified 38 417 new cases of type 2 diabetes, 53 133 new cases of hypertension and 208 627 individuals with obesity. Dyslipidaemia was found in 77.3% of individuals with available blood samples. Comorbidities were highly prevalent, especially in people with obesity. Only 5.47% (n=17 774) of individuals were linked with their corresponding primary health centre. Factors associated with unawareness of and uncontrolled NCDs were sex, age, and social determinants, for example, rural/urban environment, access to healthcare service, and education level. Patients with type 2 diabetes treated at clinics under the CASALUD model were more likely to achieve disease control (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.61).

conclusionPatient-centred screening strategies such as MIDO are urgently needed to improve screening, access, retention and control for patients with NCDs.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Noncommunicable DiseasesHumansMass ScreeningMexicoPrimary Health Carediabetes & endocrinologyhealth services administration & managementpreventive medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID34475175
PMCPMC8413929
OpenAlexW3197094476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.