Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34475023›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

Whose voices should shape global health education? Curriculum codesign and codelivery by people with direct expertise and lived experience.

Mariam Sbaiti, Mike J Streule, Mervat Alhaffar, Victoria Pilkington, Melanie Leis, Shyam Sundar Budhathoki, Hala Mkhallalati, Maryam Omar, Lillian Liu, Amelia Kataria Golestaneh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cultural Sensitivity and Ethical Considerations.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mariam SbaitiDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK m.sbaiti@ic.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9876-1486
Mike J StreuleCentre for Higher Education Research and Scholarship, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mervat AlhaffarDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3737-8790
Victoria PilkingtonNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Melanie LeisInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4352-9708
Shyam Sundar BudhathokiDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8614-1087
Hala MkhallalatiSyria Research Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London and National University of Singapore Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, UK/ Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0347-1137
Maryam OmarDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3519-3706
Lillian LiuSchool of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9294-3433
Amelia Kataria GolestanehSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Aula AbbaraDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are contrasting opinions of what global health (GH) curricula should contain and limited discussion on whose voices should shape it. In GH education, those with first-hand expertise of living and working in the contexts discussed in GH classrooms are often absent when designing curricula. To address this, we developed a new model of curriculum codesign called Virtual Roundtable for Collaborative Education Design (ViRCoED). This paper describes the rationale and outputs of the ViRCoED approach in designing a new section of the Global Health Bachelor of Science (BSc) curriculum at Imperial College London, with a focus on healthcare in the Syrian conflict. The team, importantly, involved partners with lived and/or professional experience of the conflict as well as alumni of the course and educators in all stages of design and delivery through to marking and project evaluation. The project experimented with disrupting power dynamics and extending ownership of the curriculum beyond traditional faculty by codesigning and codelivering module contents together with colleagues with direct expertise and experience of the Syrian context. An authentic approach was applied to assessment design using real-time syndromic healthcare data from the Aleppo and Idlib Governorates. We discuss the challenges involved in our collaborative partnership and describe how it may have enhanced the validity of our curriculum with students engaging in a richer representation of key health issues in the conflict. We observed an enhanced self-reflexivity in the students' approach to quantitative data and its complex interpretation. The dialogic nature of this collaborative design was also a formative process for partners and an opportunity for GH educators to reflect on their own positionality. The project aims to challenge current standards and structures in GH curriculum development and gesture towards a GH education sector eventually led by those with lived experience and expertise to significantly enhance the validity of GH education.

Indexed as

CurriculumGlobal HealthDelivery of Health CareHealth EducationHumansepidemiologyhealth policies and all other topicshealth systemspublic health

Identifiers

PMID34475023
PMCPMC8413871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.