Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34474731›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American College of Cardiology2021

Metoprolol in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19.

Agustín Clemente-Moragón, Juan Martínez-Milla, Eduardo Oliver, Arnoldo Santos, Javier Flandes, Iker Fernández, Lorena Rodríguez-González, Cristina Serrano Del Castillo, Ana-María Ioan, María López-Álvarez and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Proteomic Analysis of COVID-19 Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeting GαBasic research in cardiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A tale of pigs, beta-blockers and genetic variants.Basic research in cardiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Neutrophil βBritish journal of pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Agustín Clemente-MoragónCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Juan Martínez-MillaCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain; Cardiology Department, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo OliverCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain.
Arnoldo SantosIntensive Care Unit, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain.
Javier FlandesDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Iker FernándezDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Lorena Rodríguez-GonzálezPathology Department, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Biobank Patform-PT20/00141, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Serrano Del CastilloFlow Citometry Laboratory, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Ana-María IoanIntensive Care Unit, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
María López-ÁlvarezCardiology Department, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain.
Sandra Gómez-TalaveraCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain; Cardiology Department, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Galán-ArriolaCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain.
Valentín FusterCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain; Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
César Pérez-CalvoIntensive Care Unit, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Borja IbáñezCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain; Cardiology Department, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: bibanez@cnic.es.
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESSpanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research · ESCardiovascular Institute of the South · USCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) can progress to an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which involves alveolar infiltration by activated neutrophils. The beta-blocker metoprolol has been shown to ameliorate exacerbated inflammation in the myocardial infarction setting.

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of metoprolol on alveolar inflammation and on respiratory function in patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS.

methodsA total of 20 COVID-19 patients with ARDS on invasive mechanical ventilation were randomized to metoprolol (15 mg daily for 3 days) or control (no treatment). All patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) before and after metoprolol/control. The safety of metoprolol administration was evaluated by invasive hemodynamic and electrocardiogram monitoring and echocardiography.

resultsMetoprolol administration was without side effects. At baseline, neutrophil content in BAL did not differ between groups. Conversely, patients randomized to metoprolol had significantly fewer neutrophils in BAL on day 4 (median: 14.3 neutrophils/µl [Q1, Q3: 4.63, 265 neutrophils/µl] vs median: 397 neutrophils/µl [Q1, Q3: 222, 1,346 neutrophils/µl] in the metoprolol and control groups, respectively; P = 0.016). Metoprolol also reduced neutrophil extracellular traps content and other markers of lung inflammation. Oxygenation (PaO

conclusionsIn this pilot trial, intravenous metoprolol administration to patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS was safe, reduced exacerbated lung inflammation, and improved oxygenation. Repurposing metoprolol for COVID-19-associated ARDS appears to be a safe and inexpensive strategy that can alleviate the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

PandemicsSARS-CoV-2Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAdultAgedCOVID-19Critical IllnessFemaleHumansInjections, IntravenousMaleMetoprololMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsMetoprololacute careARDSCOVIDmetoprolol

Identifiers

PMID34474731
PMCPMC8404624
OpenAlexW3197396981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.