Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34474689›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2021

Powerful and robust non-parametric association testing for microbiome data via a zero-inflated quantile approach (ZINQ).

Wodan Ling, Ni Zhao, Anna M Plantinga, Lenore J Launer, Anthony A Fodor, Katie A Meyer, Michael C Wu

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wodan LingPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, 98109, USA.
Ni ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, 21205, USA.
Anna M PlantingaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Williams College, 18 Hoxsey St., Williamstown, 01267, USA.
Lenore J LaunerLaboratory of Epidemiology and Population Science, NIA, NIH, 7201 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, 20814, USA.
Anthony A FodorDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, 28223, USA.
Katie A MeyerNutrition Research Institute and Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, 500 Laureate Way, Kannapolis, 28081, USA.
Michael C WuPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, 98109, USA. mcwu@fredhutch.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3357-6570

Funding

Statistical Methods for Large Scale Microbiome Studies of Cardiovascular Disease RiskR01HL155417 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WU, MICHAEL CHIAO-AN · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
Joint Analysis of Microbiome and Other Genomic Data TypesR01GM129512 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WU, MICHAEL CHIAO-AN · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
A Novel Gut Microbial-Dependent Nutrient Metabolite and AtherosclerosisK01HL127159 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MEYER, KATIE A · 2015 to 2019
$787k
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201800003INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201800004INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201800005INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201800006INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201800007INHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL127159NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155417NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of bacterial taxa associated with diseases, exposures, and other variables of interest offers a more comprehensive understanding of the role of microbes in many conditions. However, despite considerable research in statistical methods for association testing with microbiome data, approaches that are generally applicable remain elusive. Classical tests often do not accommodate the realities of microbiome data, leading to power loss. Approaches tailored for microbiome data depend highly upon the normalization strategies used to handle differential read depth and other data characteristics, and they often have unacceptably high false positive rates, generally due to unsatisfied distributional assumptions. On the other hand, many non-parametric tests suffer from loss of power and may also present difficulties in adjusting for potential covariates. Most extant approaches also fail in the presence of heterogeneous effects. The field needs new non-parametric approaches that are tailored to microbiome data, robust to distributional assumptions, and powerful under heterogeneous effects, while permitting adjustment for covariates.

methodsAs an alternative to existing approaches, we propose a zero-inflated quantile approach (ZINQ), which uses a two-part quantile regression model to accommodate the zero inflation in microbiome data. For a given taxon, ZINQ consists of a valid test in logistic regression to model the zero counts, followed by a series of quantile rank-score based tests on multiple quantiles of the non-zero part with adjustment for the zero inflation. As a regression and quantile-based approach, the method is non-parametric and robust to irregular distributions, while providing an allowance for covariate adjustment. Since no distributional assumptions are made, ZINQ can be applied to data that has been processed under any normalization strategy.

resultsThorough simulations based on real data across a range of scenarios and application to real data sets show that ZINQ often has equivalent or higher power compared to existing tests even as it offers better control of false positives.

conclusionsWe present ZINQ, a quantile-based association test between microbiota and dichotomous or quantitative clinical variables, providing a powerful and robust alternative for the current microbiome differential abundance analysis. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBacteriaHeterogeneityMicrobiome differential abundance analysisType I error controlZero-inflated quantile-based approach

Identifiers

PMID34474689
PMCPMC8414689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.