GuidelineBlood advances2021
American Society of Hematology living guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19: May 2021 update on the use of intermediate-intensity anticoagulation in critically ill patients.
Guideline in Blood advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- American Society of Hematology living guidelines on use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis for patients with COVID-19: executive summary.Blood advances · 2025Guideline
- Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for anticoagulation therapy in COVID-19: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Saudi medical journal · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- American Society of Hematology living guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19: July 2021 update on postdischarge thromboprophylaxis.Blood advances · 2022Guideline
- An interpretable early intensive care unit model for predicting in-hospital mortality in trauma patients combined with rib fractures: development and external validation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Deep Vein Thrombosis in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia: Incidence, Wells Score Diagnostic Performance, and Hospital Prognosis.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Observational
- Association between Active Cancer and Risk of Thrombotic and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Outpatients with COVID-19: A CORONA-VTE Network Analysis.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Incidence of Thrombotic Complications in COVID-19 Patients and the Impact of Antithrombotic Therapy on ICU Mortality.Cureus · 2025Article
- Special Issue "COVID-19 Coagulopathy: Advances on Pathophysiology and Therapies".International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The impacts of prophylactic anticoagulation therapy during hospitalization on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk COVID-19 patients amid the omicron wave of the pandemic.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
- Which are the optimal thromboprophylaxis strategies for hospitalized patients with COVID-19? current controversies.Vascular · 2024Review
- Review
- Uncoupling of platelet granule release and integrin activation suggests GPIIb/IIIa as a therapeutic target in COVID-19.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Rivaroxaban to prevent major clinical outcomes in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: the CARE - COALITION VIII randomised clinical trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Cerebrovascular Manifestations of SARS-CoV-2: A Comprehensive Review.Current treatment options in neurology · 2023Review
- Association between Thrombin Generation and Clinical Characteristics in COVID-19 Patients.Acta haematologica · 2023Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Anticoagulant Therapy in COVID-19 Patients with Pre-Existing Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review.Infection and drug resistance · 2023Review
- Does High-Dose Thromboprophylaxis Improve Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients? A Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
- Occurrence of Thromboembolic Events and Mortality Among Hospitalized Coronavirus 2019 Patients: Large Observational Cohort Study of Electronic Health Records.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Tinzaparin in Prophylactic, Intermediate and Therapeutic Doses in Non-Critically Ill Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: The PROTHROMCOVID Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
47 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19-related critical illness is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).
objectiveThese evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in making decisions about the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19-related critical illness who do not have confirmed or suspected VTE.
methodsASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 3 patient representatives and applied strategies to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Centre supported the guideline development process by performing systematic evidence reviews (up to 5 March 2021). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the GRADE approach to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. This is an update on guidelines published in February 2021.
resultsThe panel agreed on 1 additional recommendation. The panel issued a conditional recommendation in favor of prophylactic-intensity over intermediate-intensity anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19-related critical illness who do not have confirmed or suspected VTE.
conclusionsThis recommendation was based on low certainty in the evidence, which underscores the need for additional high-quality, randomized, controlled trials comparing different intensities of anticoagulation in critically ill patients. Other key research priorities include better evidence regarding predictors of thrombosis and bleeding risk in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and the impact of nonanticoagulant therapies (eg, antiviral agents, corticosteroids) on thrombotic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.