Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34474085›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular biology2022

Merging Established Mechanisms with New Insights: Condensates, Hubs, and the Regulation of RNA Polymerase II Transcription.

Megan Palacio, Dylan J Taatjes

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current Challenges of Transcription Compartmentalization Research.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. amyloid-predict and LLPS-predict: Predicting phase separation propensities in the intrinsically disordered proteome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enhancer Dynamics for Gene Regulation in the Cardiovascular System.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Divergent condensates tune transcriptional responses during stress.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan PalacioDept. of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Dylan J TaatjesDept. of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. Electronic address: taatjes@colorado.edu.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Predoctoral Training Molecular BiophysicsT32GM065103 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI FALKE, JOSEPH J · 2002 to 2021
$4.3M
Supplemental request for MAX-TL Ultracentrifuge and rotorR35GM139550 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Dylan J Taatjes · 2021 to 2026
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139550NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulation of RNA polymerase II (pol II) transcription requires a complex and context-specific array of proteins and protein complexes, as well as nucleic acids and metabolites. Every major physiological process requires coordinated transcription of specific sets of genes at the appropriate time, and a breakdown in this regulation is a hallmark of human disease. A proliferation of recent studies has revealed that many general transcription components, including sequence-specific, DNA-binding transcription factors, Mediator, and pol II itself, are capable of liquid-liquid phase separation, to form condensates that partition these factors away from the bulk aqueous phase. These findings hold great promise for next-level understanding of pol II transcription; however, many mechanistic aspects align with more conventional models, and whether phase separation per se regulates pol II activity in cells remains controversial. In this review, we describe the conventional and condensate-dependent models, and why their similarities and differences are important. We also compare and contrast these models in the context of genome organization and pol II transcription (initiation, elongation, and termination), and highlight the central role of RNA in these processes. Finally, we discuss mutations that disrupt normal partitioning of transcription factors, and how this may contribute to disease.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticBiophysical PhenomenaCell NucleusGenome, HumanHumansMutationRNARNA Polymerase IITranscription FactorsRNARNA Polymerase IITranscription Factorscondensatesliquid-liquid phase separationmediatorRNA polymerase IItranscription

Identifiers

PMID34474085
PMCPMC8748285
OpenAlexW3197449441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.