Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34474065›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2021

Early auditory cortical processing predicts auditory speech in noise identification and lipreading.

James W Dias, Carolyn M McClaskey, Kelly C Harris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Direct Auditory Subcortical Route to the Amygdala Associated with Fear in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James W DiasMedical University of South Carolina, United States. Electronic address: diasj@musc.edu.
Carolyn M McClaskeyMedical University of South Carolina, United States.
Kelly C HarrisMedical University of South Carolina, United States.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN REALISTIC ENVIRONMENTSP50DC000422 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 1989 to 2025
$45.3M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
Interdisciplinary Research Training in Otolaryngology and Communication SciencesT32DC014435 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 2015 to 2024
$2.9M
Neural determinates of cortical plasticity with age and hearing lossR01DC017619 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HARRIS, KELLY C · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
Neural determinents of sound encoding in the aging ear and brainR01DC014467 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HARRIS, KELLY C · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
RENOVATION TO SUPPORT SENSORY NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCHC06RR014516 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND, JOHN R · 1999 to 1999
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR014516NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000422NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014467NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017619NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC014435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals typically exhibit better cross-sensory perception following unisensory loss, demonstrating improved perception of information available from the remaining senses and increased cross-sensory use of neural resources. Even individuals with no sensory loss will exhibit such changes in cross-sensory processing following temporary sensory deprivation, suggesting that the brain's capacity for recruiting cross-sensory sources to compensate for degraded unisensory input is a general characteristic of the perceptual process. Many studies have investigated how auditory and visual neural structures respond to within- and cross-sensory input. However, little attention has been given to how general auditory and visual neural processing relates to within and cross-sensory perception. The current investigation examines the extent to which individual differences in general auditory neural processing accounts for variability in auditory, visual, and audiovisual speech perception in a sample of young healthy adults. Auditory neural processing was assessed using a simple click stimulus. We found that individuals with a smaller P1 peak amplitude in their auditory-evoked potential (AEP) had more difficulty identifying speech sounds in difficult listening conditions, but were better lipreaders. The results suggest that individual differences in the auditory neural processing of healthy adults can account for variability in the perception of information available from the auditory and visual modalities, similar to the cross-sensory perceptual compensation observed in individuals with sensory loss.

Indexed as

LipreadingSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory PerceptionHumansNoiseSpeechVisual PerceptionAudiovisualAuditoryAuditory-evoked potential (AEP)LipreadSpeechVisual

Identifiers

PMID34474065
PMCPMC8487996
OpenAlexW3198838104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.