Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34474049›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2021

The biological significance and clinical utility of emerging blood biomarkers for traumatic brain injury.

Megan E Huibregtse, Jeffrey J Bazarian, Sandy R Shultz, Keisuke Kawata

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Research progress on biomarkers of traumatic brain injury.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ALKBH5 demethylates the mProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megan E HuibregtseDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, Indiana University, 1025 E 7th St, Suite 112, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: mhuibreg@indiana.edu.
Jeffrey J BazarianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 200 E River Rd, Rochester, NY 14623, USA. Electronic address: Jeff_Bazarian@urmc.rochester.edu.
Sandy R ShultzDepartment of Neuroscience, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Level 6, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Clinical Sciences Building, 4th Floor, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia. Electronic address: Sandy.Shultz@monash.edu.
Keisuke KawataDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, Indiana University, 1025 E 7th St, Suite 112, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Program in Neuroscience, College of Arts and Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: kkawata@indiana.edu.

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Subconcussive neurodegenerative progression in adolescent athletesR01NS113950 · NINDS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KAWATA, KEISUKE · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Neuroimaging and blood biomarkers for subconcussive neural stress on ADHDR21NS116548 · NINDS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KAWATA, KEISUKE, NEWMAN, SHARLENE D · 2020 to 2020
$436k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113950NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS116548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HUIBREGTSE, M.E, Bazarian, J.J., Shultz, S.R., and Kawata K. The biological significance and clinical utility of emerging blood biomarkers for traumatic brain injury. NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV REV XX (130) 433-447, 2021.- Blood biomarkers can serve as objective measures to gauge traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity, identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes, and predict recovery duration, yet the clinical use of blood biomarkers for TBI is limited to a select few and only to rule out the need for CT scanning. The biomarkers often examined in neurotrauma research are proteomic markers, which can reflect a range of pathological processes such as cellular damage, astrogliosis, or neuroinflammation. However, proteomic blood biomarkers are vulnerable to degradation, resulting in short half-lives. Emerging biomarkers for TBI may reflect the complex genetic and neurometabolic alterations that occur following TBI that are not captured by proteomics, are less vulnerable to degradation, and are comprised of microRNA, extracellular vesicles, and neurometabolites. Therefore, this review aims to summarize our understanding of how biomarkers for brain injury escape the brain parenchymal space and appear in the bloodstream, update recent research findings in several proteomic biomarkers, and characterize biological significance and examine clinical utility of microRNA, extracellular vesicles, and neurometabolites.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticMicroRNAsBiomarkersHumansProteomicsBiomarkersMicroRNAsBlood biomarkersExtracellular vesiclesMetabolomicsmicroRNAProteomicsTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID34474049
PMCPMC8511294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.