ReviewBrain research2021
Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR).
Review in Brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testing differential effects of periodicity and predictability in auditory rhythmic cueing of concurrent speech.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Perceptual warping exposes categorical representations for speech in human brainstem responses.NeuroImage · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In nonlinear systems, the inclusion of low-level noise can paradoxically improve signal detection, a phenomenon known as stochastic resonance (SR). SR has been observed in human hearing whereby sensory thresholds (e.g., signal detection and discrimination) are enhanced in the presence of noise. Here, we asked whether subcortical auditory processing (neural phase locking) shows evidence of SR. We recorded brainstem frequency-following-responses (FFRs) in young, normal-hearing listeners to near-electrophysiological-threshold (40 dB SPL) complex tones composed of 10 iso-amplitude harmonics of 150 Hz fundamental frequency (F0) presented concurrent with low-level noise (+20 to -20 dB SNRs). Though variable and weak across ears, some listeners showed improvement in auditory detection thresholds with subthreshold noise confirming SR psychophysically. At the neural level, low-level FFRs were initially eradicated by noise (expected masking effect) but were surprisingly reinvigorated at select masker levels (local maximum near ∼ 35 dB SPL). These data suggest brainstem phase-locking to near threshold periodic stimuli is enhanced in optimal levels of noise, the hallmark of SR. Our findings provide novel evidence for stochastic resonance in the human auditory brainstem and suggest that under some circumstances, noise can actually benefit both the behavioral and neural encoding of complex sounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.