Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34473875›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2021

Surgical treatment of pressure injuries in children: A multicentre experience.

Marco Pignatti, Salvatore D'Arpa, Nathalie Roche, Federico A Giorgini, Irene Laura Lusetti, Concepcion Lorca-Garcia, Giorgio De Santis, Beatriz Berenguer

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Surgical treatment of pressure injuries in children: A multicentre experience.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marco PignattiPlastic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Orsola di Bologna, Bologna.ORCID 0000-0002-8259-496X
Salvatore D'ArpaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1318-1870
Nathalie RocheDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9241-8583
Federico A GiorginiPlastic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Orsola di Bologna, Bologna.ORCID 0000-0002-9074-4331
Irene Laura LusettiPlastic Surgery, University of Modena e Reggio, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2564-9610
Concepcion Lorca-GarciaPediatric Plastic Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0482-5811
Giorgio De SantisPlastic Surgery, University of Modena e Reggio, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6717-5767
Beatriz BerenguerPediatric Plastic Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5512-3695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pressure injuries (PI) are infrequent in paediatric patients, prevalence estimates ranging from 1.4% to 8.2%, and reaching values as high as 43.1% in critical care areas. They can be associated with congenital neurological or metabolic disorders that cause reduced mobility or require the need for medical devices. In children, most pressure injuries heal spontaneously. However, a small percentage of ulcers that is refractory to conservative management or is too severe at presentation (Stage 3 or 4) will be candidates for surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical history of paediatric patients affected by pressure injuries from four European Plastic Surgery Centres. Information was collected from clinical and radiology records, and laboratory reports. An accurate search of the literature revealed only two articles reporting on the surgical treatment of pressure injuries in children. After debridement, we performed surgical coverage of the pressure injuries. We report here our experience with 18 children aged 1-17 years, affected by pressure injury Stages 3 and 4. They were successfully treated with pedicled (17 patients) or free flaps (1 patient). The injuries involved the sacrum (6/18 patients), lower limb (3/18 patients), thoracic spine (2/18 patients), ischium (3/18 patients, bilateral in one patient), temporal area (3/18 patients), hypogastrium (1/18 patients) and were associated to medical devices in three cases. Flaps were followed for a minimum of 19 months and up to 13 years. Only two patients developed true recurrences that were treated again surgically. Pressure injuries are infrequent in children and rarely need surgical treatment. Pedicled flaps have a high success rate. Recurrences, contrary to what is reported in the literature, were rare.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresPressure UlcerChildHumansLower ExtremityRetrospective StudiesSurgical FlapsTreatment OutcomeWound Healingchildrenperforator flappressure injurypressure sorerecurrence

Identifiers

PMID34473875
PMCPMC9293131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.