Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34473589›Full record

SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Understanding the determinants of vaccine hesitancy and vaccine confidence among adolescents: a systematic review.

Chiara Cadeddu, Carolina Castagna, Martina Sapienza, Teresa Eleonora Lanza, Rosaria Messina, Manuela Chiavarini, Walter Ricciardi, Chiara de Waure

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara CadedduSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Carolina CastagnaSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Martina SapienzaSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Teresa Eleonora LanzaSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Rosaria MessinaSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Manuela ChiavariniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Walter RicciardiSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Chiara de WaureDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4346-1494
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy (VH) in the age of adolescence is a major public health issue, though it has not been widely examined in the scientific literature. This systematic review aims to address the determinants of VH among adolescents aged 10-19. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from the inception until 11 December 2020. Articles in English, assessing adolescents' attitudes toward vaccination in terms of hesitancy and/or confidence were considered eligible. Out of 14,704 articles, 20 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Quality assessment was performed through the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). A better knowledge of vaccine-preventable diseases, a higher confidence in vaccines, as well as an active involvement in the decision-making process showed a positive relationship with adolescents' vaccine uptake. These aspects should be considered to plan tailored interventions for the promotion of vaccination among adolescents and to reduce VH. Major limitations of this review are represented by the high heterogeneity of the tools used in the primary studies and the lack of standardization in outcomes definitions. Future research is needed to disentangle the interrelationship among the different determinants of VH in this age group.

Indexed as

Vaccination HesitancyVaccinesAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVaccinesAdolescentsattitudesconfidencehesitancyhpvimmunizationstudentsteenagersvaccinationvaccine

Identifiers

PMID34473589
PMCPMC8828162
OpenAlexW3196805876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.