Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34473411›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences2022

Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis.

Yuzo Umeda, Toshiharu Mitsuhashi, Toru Kojima, Daisuke Satoh, Kenta Sui, Yoshikatsu Endo, Masaru Inagaki, Masahiro Oishi, Takahito Yagi, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Is Lymphadenectomy Reasonable for Elderly Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Yuzo UmedaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5778-6863
Toshiharu MitsuhashiCenter for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Toru KojimaDepartment of Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Daisuke SatohDepartment of Surgery, Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kenta SuiDepartment of Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan.
Yoshikatsu EndoDepartment of Surgery, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, Himeji, Japan.
Masaru InagakiDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center, Fukuyama, Japan.
Masahiro OishiDepartment of Surgery, Tottori Municipal Hospital, Tottori, Japan.
Takahito YagiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Toshiyoshi FujiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Okayama University · JPFukuyama Cardiovascular Hospital · JPHimeji Red Cross Hospital · JPHiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital · JPOkayama Saiseikai General Hospital · JPOkayama University Hospital · JPTottori University Hospital · JPUniversity of Kochi · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K09217Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 19K09217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymph node metastasis (LNM) has been established as a critical risk factor for prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The clinical implications of lymph node dissection (LND) have been debated. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of LND by multicenter retrospective analysis.

methodsA total of 310 ICC patients who had undergone curative resection between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic impact of LND was estimated under an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach using propensity scores.

resultsLND was performed for 224 patients (72%), with LNM pathologically confirmed in 90 patients (40%). Prognosis was poorer for patients with LNM (median survival, 16.9 months) than for those without (57.2 months; P < .0001). One-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates (OS) were comparable among LND+ (81.6%, 48.0%, and 37.5%, respectively) and LND- groups (81.6%, 55.4%, and 44.6%, respectively). However, advanced tumor, as characterized by larger tumor, multinodular lesions, and serosal invasion, was significantly more frequent in the LND+ group than in the LND- group. After IPTW adjusting for imbalances, 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were better in the LND+ group (83.5%, 52.2%, and 42.8%, respectively) than in the LND- group (71.9%, 32.4%, and 23.4%, respectively; P = .046). LND thus showed significant prognostic impact (hazard ratio = 0.58, 95%CI = |0.39|-|0.84|, P = .005), especially in hilar ICC. However, peripheral ICC displayed no therapeutic benefit from LND.

conclusionsLND could have a significant role to play in improving oncologic outcomes. Therapeutic LND should be implemented on the basis of tumor location and tumor advancement.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesPrognosisPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSurvival Analysisintrahepatic cholangiocarcinomalymph node excisionmulticenter studypropensity scoreretrospective studies

Identifiers

PMID34473411
PMCPMC9291593
OpenAlexW3197549356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.