Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34473405›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International AIDS Society2021

HIV self-testing and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis are empowering for sex workers and their intimate partners: a qualitative study in Uganda.

Andrew Mujugira, Agnes Nakyanzi, Vicent Kasiita, Brenda Kamusiime, Grace K Nalukwago, Alisaati Nalumansi, Chris C Twesigye, Timothy R Muwonge, Jared M Baeten, Monique A Wyatt and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03426670 (HIV Self-Testing to Empower Prevention Choices in Sex Workers), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03426670 nacompletednot on this map

HIV Self-Testing to Empower Prevention Choices in Sex Workers

TypeinterventionalSponsorMakerere UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled110ConditionsHIV/AIDSArmsOraQuick HIV Self-Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andrew MujugiraInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-6646-6733
Agnes NakyanziInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Vicent KasiitaInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Brenda KamusiimeInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Grace K NalukwagoInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Alisaati NalumansiInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Chris C TwesigyeInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Timothy R MuwongeInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Jared M BaetenDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8242-8438
Monique A WyattDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jessica E HabererMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5845-3190
Norma C WareDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5039-9991

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CONNIE L CELUM · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Optimizing mHealth for adherence monitoring and interventionK24MH114732 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HABERER, JESSICA ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2021
$800k
HIV Self Testing to Empower Prevention Choices in Sex WorkersK43TW010695 · FIC · INFECTIOUS DISEASES INSTITUTE · PI MUJUGIRA, ANDREW · 2017 to 2021
$530k
FIC NIH HHS K43 TW010695NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH114732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV self-testing (HIVST) and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are complementary, evidence-based, self-controlled HIV prevention tools that may be particularly appealing to sex workers. Understanding how HIVST and PrEP are perceived and used by sex workers and their intimate partners could inform prevention delivery for this population. We conducted qualitative interviews to examine ways in which HIVST and PrEP use influence prevention choices among sex workers in Uganda.

methodsWithin a randomized trial of HIVST and PrEP among 110 HIV-negative cisgender women, cisgender men and transgender women sex workers (NCT03426670), we conducted 40 qualitative interviews with 30 sex workers and 10 intimate partners (June 2018 to January 2020). Sex worker interviews explored (a) experiences of using HIVST kits; (b) how HIVST was performed with sexual partners; (c) impact of HIVST on PrEP pill taking; and (d) sexual risk behaviours after HIVST. Partner interviews covered (i) introduction of HIVST; (ii) experiences of using HIVST; (iii) HIV status disclosure; and (iv) HIVST's effect on sexual behaviours. Data were analysed using an inductive content analytic approach centering on descriptive category development. Together, these categories detail the meaning of HIVST and PrEP for these qualitative participants.

resultsUsing HIVST and PrEP was empowering for this group of sex workers and their partners. Three types of empowerment were observed: (a) economic; (b) relational; and (c) sexual health. (i) Using HIVST and PrEP made sex without condoms safer. Sex workers could charge more for condomless sex, which was empowering economically. (ii) Self-testing restored trust in partners' fidelity upon being reunited after a separation. This trust, in combination with condomless sex made possible by PrEP use, restored intimacy, empowering partnered relationships. (iii) HIVST and PrEP enabled sex workers to take control of their HIV prevention efforts and avoid the stigma of public clinic visits. In this way they were empowered to protect their sexual health.

conclusionsIn this sample, sex workers' use of HIVST and PrEP benefitted not only prevention efforts, but also economic and relational empowerment. Understanding these larger benefits and communicating them to stakeholders could strengthen uptake and use of combination prevention interventions in this marginalized population.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSex WorkersFemaleHumansMalePower, PsychologicalQualitative ResearchSelf-TestingSexual PartnersUgandaAfricaempowermentHIV preventionHIV self-testingpre-exposure prophylaxissex workers

Identifiers

PMID34473405
PMCPMC8412089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.