Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34473312›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

The New Frontier of Three-Dimensional Culture Models to Scale-Up Cancer Research.

Caleb Jensen, Chloe Shay, Yong Teng

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caleb JensenDepartment of Oral Biology and Diagnostic Sciences, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Chloe ShayDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory Children's Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yong TengDepartment of Oral Biology and Diagnostic Sciences, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. yong.teng@emory.edu.

Funding

ATAD3A as a Novel Target in Head and Neck CancerR01DE028351 · NIDCR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI TENG, YONG · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
The Impact of Arf1 on Hypoxia Signaling and Oral CancerR03DE028387 · NIDCR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI TENG, YONG · 2019 to 2020
$306k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro cancer research models require the utmost accuracy and precision to effectively investigate physiological pathways and mechanisms, as well as test the therapeutic efficacy of anticancer drugs. Although two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models have been the traditional hallmark of cancer research, increasing evidence suggests 2D tumor models cannot accurately recapitulate complex aspects of tumor cells and drug responses. Three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures, however, are more physiologically relevant in oncology as they model the cancer network and microenvironment better, allowing for development and assessment of natural products and other anticancer drugs. The present review outlines unprecedented ways in which multicellular spheroid models, organoid models, hydrogel models, microfluidic devices, microfiber scaffold models, and tissue-engineered scaffold models are used in this research. The future of cancer research lies within 3D cell cultures, and as this approach improves, cancer research will continue to advance.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell Culture Techniques, Three DimensionalNeoplasmsAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorHumansSpheroids, CellularAntineoplastic Agents3D cell culturesCancer cell modelsCancer researchDrug responseNatural products

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.