ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022
An Artificial Intelligence System for the Detection of Bladder Cancer via Cystoscopy: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal large language models for bladder tumor detection in cystoscopy: a retrospective benchmarking study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- A multi-modal approach for decision making in bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and predictive tools in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a narrative review of current insights and advances.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Article
- A Novel Radiomics-based Interpretable Model for Bladder Cancer Grade Prediction Using White-Light Cystoscopy Images.European urology open science · 2026Article
- 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Based Fluorescence Guidance in Urologic Oncology: Current Status, Pitfalls, and Future Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in the management of localized bladder cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence diagnostics for bladder tumor identification and grade prediction depend on narrow band imaging cystoscopy.iScience · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and spinal cord injury: current status, emerging technologies, and ethical perspectives.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence as a Tool in the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Beyond Visualization: Advanced Imaging, Theragnostics and Biomarker Integration in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Bladder Cancer: A Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- How Accurately Can Urologists Predict Eligible Patients for Immediate Postoperative Intravesical Chemotherapy in Bladder Cancer?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leveraging Deep Learning in Real-Time Intelligent Bladder Tumor Detection During Cystoscopy: A Diagnostic Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Oncology: Current Insights and Challenges.Research and reports in urology · 2025Review
- Optimizing cystoscopy and TURBT: enhanced imaging and artificial intelligence.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Recent Advances and Emerging Innovations in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor (TURBT) for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Current Literature.Research and reports in urology · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the AI-Based Software INF-M01 in Detecting Suspicious Areas of Bladder Cancer Using Cystoscopy Images.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Radiomics models to predict bone marrow metastasis of neuroblastoma using CT.Cancer innovation · 2024Article
- Automated Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Tumor Segmentation During Ureteroscopy Using Computer Vision Techniques.Journal of endourology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCystoscopy plays an important role in bladder cancer (BCa) diagnosis and treatment, but its sensitivity needs improvement. Artificial intelligence has shown promise in endoscopy, but few cystoscopic applications have been reported. We report a Cystoscopy Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System (CAIDS) for BCa diagnosis.
methodsIn total, 69 204 images from 10 729 consecutive patients from 6 hospitals were collected and divided into training, internal validation, and external validation sets. The CAIDS was built using a pyramid scene parsing network and transfer learning. A subset (n = 260) of the validation sets was used for a performance comparison between the CAIDS and urologists for complex lesion detection. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.
resultsThe diagnostic accuracies of the CAIDS were 0.977 (95% CI = 0.974 to 0.979) in the internal validation set and 0.990 (95% CI = 0.979 to 0.996), 0.982 (95% CI = 0.974 to 0.988), 0.978 (95% CI = 0.959 to 0.989), and 0.991 (95% CI = 0.987 to 0.994) in different external validation sets. In the CAIDS vs urologists' comparisons, the CAIDS showed high accuracy and sensitivity (accuracy = 0.939, 95% CI = 0.902 to 0.964; sensitivity = 0.954, 95% CI = 0.902 to 0.983) with a short latency of 12 seconds, much more accurate and quicker than the expert urologists.
conclusionsThe CAIDS achieved accurate BCa detection with a short latency. The CAIDS may provide many clinical benefits, from increasing the diagnostic accuracy for BCa, even for commonly misdiagnosed cases such as flat cancerous tissue (carcinoma in situ), to reducing the operation time for cystoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.