Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34473241›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2022

Pollen limitation and xenia effects in a cultivated mass-flowering tree, Macadamia integrifolia (Proteaceae).

Stephen J Trueman, Wiebke Kämper, Joel Nichols, Steven M Ogbourne, David Hawkes, Trent Peters, Shahla Hosseini Bai, Helen M Wallace

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identification of self-incompatibility in macadamiaFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. The Impact of Colony Deployment Timing onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen J TruemanCentre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7105-7130
Wiebke KämperCentre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.
Joel NicholsCentre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.
Steven M OgbourneGeneCology Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia.
David HawkesAustralian Genome Research Facility, Gehrmann Laboratories, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Trent PetersAustralian Genome Research Facility, Gehrmann Laboratories, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Shahla Hosseini BaiCentre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.
Helen M WallaceCentre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.
Griffith University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPollen limitation is most prevalent among bee-pollinated plants, self-incompatible plants and tropical plants. However, we have very little understanding of the extent to which pollen limitation affects fruit set in mass-flowering trees despite tree crops accounting for at least 600 million tons of the 9200 million tons of annual global food production.

methodsWe determined the extent of pollen limitation in a bee-pollinated, partially self-incompatible, subtropical tree by hand cross-pollinating the majority of flowers on mass-flowering macadamia (Macadamia integrifolia) trees that produce about 200 000-400 000 flowers. We measured tree yield and kernel quality and estimated final fruit set. We genotyped individual kernels by MassARRAY to determine levels of outcrossing in orchards and assess paternity effects on nut quality. KEY

resultsMacadamia trees were pollen-limited. Supplementary cross-pollination increased nut-in-shell yield, kernel yield and fruit set by as much as 97, 109 and 92 %, respectively. The extent of pollen limitation depended upon the proximity of experimental trees to trees of another cultivar because macadamia trees were highly outcrossing. Between 84 and 100 % of fruit arose from cross-pollination, even at 200 m (25 rows) from orchard blocks of another cultivar. Large variations in nut-in-shell mass, kernel mass, kernel recovery and kernel oil concentration were related to differences in fruit paternity, including between self-pollinated and cross-pollinated fruit, thus demonstrating pollen-parent effects on fruit quality (i.e. xenia).

conclusionsThis study is the first to demonstrate pollen limitation in a mass-flowering tree. Improved pollination led to increased kernel yield of 0.31-0.59 tons ha-1, which equates currently to higher farm-gate income of approximately $US3720-$US7080 ha-1. The heavy reliance of macadamia flowers on cross-pollination and the strong xenia effects on kernel mass demonstrate the high value that pollination services can provide to food production.

Indexed as

ProteaceaeTreesAnimalsFlowersMacadamiaPollenPollinationReproductionBreeding systemcross-pollinationkernelmacadamiaMacadamia integrifoliamating systemnutpollen limitationpollinationProteaceaeself-incompatibilityxenia

Identifiers

PMID34473241
PMCPMC8796667
OpenAlexW3197052914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.