Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34473067›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

Upper-Limb Motion Recognition Based on Hybrid Feature Selection: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Qiaoqin Li, Yongguo Liu, Jiajing Zhu, Zhi Chen, Lang Liu, Shangming Yang, Guanyi Zhu, Bin Zhu, Juan Li, Rongjiang Jin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Machine-learning models for shoulder rehabilitation exercises classification using a wearable system.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. CNN-LSTM Model for Recognizing Video-Recorded Actions Performed in a Traditional Chinese Exercise.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Qiaoqin LiKnowledge and Data Engineering Laboratory of Chinese Medicine, School of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9225-307X
Yongguo LiuKnowledge and Data Engineering Laboratory of Chinese Medicine, School of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4906-7025
Jiajing ZhuKnowledge and Data Engineering Laboratory of Chinese Medicine, School of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5916-3141
Zhi ChenKnowledge and Data Engineering Laboratory of Chinese Medicine, School of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5159-1280
Lang LiuKnowledge and Data Engineering Laboratory of Chinese Medicine, School of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7724-3375
Shangming YangKnowledge and Data Engineering Laboratory of Chinese Medicine, School of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7227-3698
Guanyi ZhuCollege of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5526-8256
Bin ZhuChengdu Chronic Diseases Hospital, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8412-5577
Juan LiCollege of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8530-9001
Rongjiang JinCollege of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4733-9955
Jing TaoCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9751-5294
Lidian ChenCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8699-0839
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNFujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNHunan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor rehabilitation training systems, it is essential to automatically record and recognize exercises, especially when more than one type of exercise is performed without a predefined sequence. Most motion recognition methods are based on feature engineering and machine learning algorithms. Time-domain and frequency-domain features are extracted from original time series data collected by sensor nodes. For high-dimensional data, feature selection plays an important role in improving the performance of motion recognition. Existing feature selection methods can be categorized into filter and wrapper methods. Wrapper methods usually achieve better performance than filter methods; however, in most cases, they are computationally intensive, and the feature subset obtained is usually optimized only for the specific learning algorithm.

objectiveThis study aimed to provide a feature selection method for motion recognition of upper-limb exercises and improve the recognition performance.

methodsMotion data from 5 types of upper-limb exercises performed by 21 participants were collected by a customized inertial measurement unit (IMU) node. A total of 60 time-domain and frequency-domain features were extracted from the original sensor data. A hybrid feature selection method by combining filter and wrapper methods (FESCOM) was proposed to eliminate irrelevant features for motion recognition of upper-limb exercises. In the filter stage, candidate features were first selected from the original feature set according to the significance for motion recognition. In the wrapper stage, k-nearest neighbors (kNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), and random forest (RF) were evaluated as the wrapping components to further refine the features from the candidate feature set. The performance of the proposed FESCOM method was verified using experiments on motion recognition of upper-limb exercises and compared with the traditional wrapper method.

resultsUsing kNN, NB, and RF as the wrapping components, the classification error rates of the proposed FESCOM method were 1.7%, 8.9%, and 7.4%, respectively, and the feature selection time in each iteration was 13 seconds, 71 seconds, and 541 seconds, respectively.

conclusionsThe experimental results demonstrated that, in the case of 5 motion types performed by 21 healthy participants, the proposed FESCOM method using kNN and NB as the wrapping components achieved better recognition performance than the traditional wrapper method. The FESCOM method dramatically reduces the search time in the feature selection process. The results also demonstrated that the optimal number of features depends on the classifier. This approach serves to improve feature selection and classification algorithm selection for upper-limb motion recognition based on wearable sensor data, which can be extended to motion recognition of more motion types and participants.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningBayes TheoremCluster AnalysisHumansUpper Extremityfeature selectioninertial measurement unitmachine learningmotion recognitionrehabilitation exercises

Identifiers

PMID34473067
PMCPMC8446846
OpenAlexW3185246004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.