Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34473065›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2021

Designing a Clinical Decision Support Tool That Leverages Machine Learning for Suicide Risk Prediction: Development Study in Partnership With Native American Care Providers.

Emily E Haroz, Fiona Grubin, Novalene Goklish, Shardai Pioche, Mary Cwik, Allison Barlow, Emma Waugh, Jason Usher, Matthew C Lenert, Colin G Walsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A Guide to Constructing Indigenous Statistical Spaces for Prevention Science Research.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Addressing Health Disparities through Community Engagement in Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emily E HarozCenter for American Indian Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1833-4925
Fiona GrubinCenter for American Indian Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9181-1997
Novalene GoklishCenter for American Indian Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8478-4604
Shardai PiocheCenter for American Indian Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0959-4891
Mary CwikCenter for American Indian Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0551-2649
Allison BarlowCenter for American Indian Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5071-1877
Emma WaughCenter for American Indian Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8248-3859
Jason UsherCenter for American Indian Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7489-5180
Matthew C LenertDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9698-5216
Colin G WalshDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9379-2056

Funding

Vanderbilt Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007450 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica S. Ancker, Bradley A. Malin · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
Understanding the intersection between opioids and suicide through the Southwest HubU19MH113136 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CWIK, MARY · 2017 to 2023
$11.4M
SuSt-AInS: Sustainment of suicide prevention programs in American Indian SettingsK01MH116335 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HAROZ, EMILY · 2018 to 2022
$733k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH116335NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH113136NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning algorithms for suicide risk prediction have been developed with notable improvements in accuracy. Implementing these algorithms to enhance clinical care and reduce suicide has not been well studied.

objectiveThis study aims to design a clinical decision support tool and appropriate care pathways for community-based suicide surveillance and case management systems operating on Native American reservations.

methodsParticipants included Native American case managers and supervisors (N=9) who worked on suicide surveillance and case management programs on 2 Native American reservations. We used in-depth interviews to understand how case managers think about and respond to suicide risk. The results from interviews informed a draft clinical decision support tool, which was then reviewed with supervisors and combined with appropriate care pathways.

resultsCase managers reported acceptance of risk flags based on a predictive algorithm in their surveillance system tools, particularly if the information was available in a timely manner and used in conjunction with their clinical judgment. Implementation of risk flags needed to be programmed on a dichotomous basis, so the algorithm could produce output indicating high versus low risk. To dichotomize the continuous predicted probabilities, we developed a cutoff point that favored specificity, with the understanding that case managers' clinical judgment would help increase sensitivity.

conclusionsSuicide risk prediction algorithms show promise, but implementation to guide clinical care remains relatively elusive. Our study demonstrates the utility of working with partners to develop and guide the operationalization of risk prediction algorithms to enhance clinical care in a community setting.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalRisk AssessmentSuicide PreventionAlgorithmsAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeHumansMachine Learningimplementationmachine learningNative American healthsuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID34473065
PMCPMC8446841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.