Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34473054›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq uncovers shared and distinct axes of variation in dorsal LGN neurons in mice, non-human primates, and humans.

Trygve E Bakken, Cindy Tj van Velthoven, Vilas Menon, Rebecca D Hodge, Zizhen Yao, Thuc Nghi Nguyen, Lucas T Graybuck, Gregory D Horwitz, Darren Bertagnolli, Jeff Goldy and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modern Mining: The Role of Single-cell RNA Sequencing in Advancing Neuroscience Research.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A consensus spinal cord cell type atlas across mouse, macaque, and human.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Trygve E Bakken *Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3373-7386
Cindy Tj van Velthoven *Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5120-4546
Vilas Menon *Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4096-8601
Rebecca D HodgeAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Zizhen YaoAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Thuc Nghi NguyenAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Lucas T GraybuckAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8814-6818
Gregory D HorwitzWashington National Primate Research Center and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5130-5259
Darren BertagnolliAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Jeff GoldyAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Anna Marie YannyAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Emma GarrenAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Sheana ParryAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Tamara CasperAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Soraya I ShehataAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2909-064X
Eliza R BarkanAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Aaron SzaferAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Boaz P LeviAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Nick DeeAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Kimberly A SmithAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Susan M SunkinAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Amy BernardAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2540-1153
John PhillipsAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1080-7556
Michael J HawrylyczAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5741-8024
Christof KochAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Gabe J MurphyAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Ed LeinAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.
Hongkui ZengAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0326-5878
Bosiljka TasicAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6861-4506
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abundant evidence supports the presence of at least three distinct types of thalamocortical (TC) neurons in the primate dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) of the thalamus, the brain region that conveys visual information from the retina to the primary visual cortex (V1). Different types of TC neurons in mice, humans, and macaques have distinct morphologies, distinct connectivity patterns, and convey different aspects of visual information to the cortex. To investigate the molecular underpinnings of these cell types, and how these relate to differences in dLGN between human, macaque, and mice, we profiled gene expression in single nuclei and cells using RNA-sequencing. These efforts identified four distinct types of TC neurons in the primate dLGN: magnocellular (M) neurons, parvocellular (P) neurons, and two types of koniocellular (K) neurons. Despite extensively documented morphological and physiological differences between M and P neurons, we identified few genes with significant differential expression between transcriptomic cell types corresponding to these two neuronal populations. Likewise, the dominant feature of TC neurons of the adult mouse dLGN is high transcriptomic similarity, with an axis of heterogeneity that aligns with core vs. shell portions of mouse dLGN. Together, these data show that transcriptomic differences between principal cell types in the mature mammalian dLGN are subtle relative to the observed differences in morphology and cortical projection targets. Finally, alignment of transcriptome profiles across species highlights expanded diversity of GABAergic neurons in primate versus mouse dLGN and homologous types of TC neurons in primates that are distinct from TC neurons in mouse.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusGene Expression ProfilingGeniculate BodiesHumansMacacaMiceNeuronsRNA-SeqSingle-Cell AnalysisThalamusVisual CortexVisual Pathwayshumanlateral geniculate nucleusmacaca fascicularismaccaca nemestrinamouseneurosciencesingle-cell RNA-seqspecies comparison

Identifiers

PMID34473054
PMCPMC8412930
OpenAlexW3198546360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.