Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34472843›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2021

Automated Coarse-Grained Mapping Algorithm for the Martini Force Field and Benchmarks for Membrane-Water Partitioning.

Thomas D Potter, Elin L Barrett, Mark A Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Self-Assembly of Lamellae-in-Lamellae by Double-Tail Cationic Surfactants.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Automatic identification of chemical moieties.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas D PotterDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0480-4183
Elin L BarrettUnilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire MK44 1LQ, United Kingdom.
Mark A MillerDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1403-3343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With a view to high-throughput simulations, we present an automated system for mapping and parameterizing organic molecules for use with the coarse-grained Martini force field. The method scales to larger molecules and a broader chemical space than existing schemes. The core of the mapping process is a graph-based analysis of the molecule's bonding network, which has the advantages of being fast, general, and preserving symmetry. The parameterization process pays special attention to coarse-grained beads in aromatic rings. It also includes a method for building efficient and stable frameworks of constraints for molecules with structural rigidity. The performance of the method is tested on a diverse set of 87 neutral organic molecules and the ability of the resulting models to capture octanol-water and membrane-water partition coefficients. In the latter case, we introduce an adaptive method for extracting partition coefficients from free-energy profiles to take into account the interfacial region of the membrane. We also use the models to probe the response of membrane-water partitioning to the cholesterol content of the membrane.

Identifiers

PMID34472843
PMCPMC8444346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.