ArticleCroatian medical journal2021
Clinical application of the RONNA G4 system - preliminary validation of 23 robotic frameless brain biopsies.
Article in Croatian medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Frameless stereotactic brain biopsy and external ventricular drainage placement using the RONNA G4 system.Journal of surgical case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo report the outcomes of robot-assisted brain biopsies performed using a novel RONNA G4 system. The system was developed by a research group from the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture and a team of neurosurgeons from Dubrava University Hospital, University of Zagreb School of Medicine.
methodsThis prospective study included 49 biopsies analyzed during one year: 23 robotic frameless and 26 frame-based Leksell stereotactic biopsies. We analyzed the presenting symptoms, tumor range and location, postoperative complications, pathohistological diagnosis, diagnostic yield, as well as operation and hospitalization duration. The target point error was calculated to assess the accuracy of the RONNA system.
resultsNo postoperative mortality, morbidity, or infections were observed. In the frameless robotic biopsy group, only one pathohistological diagnosis was inconclusive. Therefore, the diagnostic yield was 95.6% (22/23), similar to that of the framebased Leksell stereotactic biopsy group (95.1% or 25/26). The average target point error in the frameless robotic biopsy group was 2.15±1.22 mm (range 0.39-5.85).
conclusionThe RONNA G4 robotic system is a safe and accurate tool for brain biopsy, although further research warrants a larger patient sample, comparison with other robotic systems, and a systematic analysis of the entry and target point errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34472734PMC8491043What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.