ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2021
Implantable vagus nerve stimulator settings and short-term adverse effects in epileptic dogs.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impedance changes in chronic vagus nerve stimulator implantation in epileptic dogs.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- The Postictal Phase in Canine Idiopathic Epilepsy: Semiology, Management, and Impact on the Quality of Life from the Owners' Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Transcutaneous Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation Induces Changes in the Electroencephalogram and Heart Rate Variability of Healthy Dogs, a Pilot Study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Neurostimulation as a Method of Treatment and a Preventive Measure in Canine Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Current State and Future Prospects.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
- Implantable vagus nerve stimulator settings and short-term adverse effects in epileptic dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2021Article
- Long-term outcome of epileptic dogs treated with implantable vagus nerve stimulators.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
- ACVIM Consensus Statement on the management of status epilepticus and cluster seizures in dogs and cats.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplantable vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) devices can be used to treat epilepsy in dogs. Adverse effects and short-term complications associated with delivering suggested therapeutic electrical stimulation (>1.5 mA) are not well-described.
objectivesTo compare complications and adverse effects observed with standard and rapid protocols of current increase. ANIMALS: Sixteen client-owned dogs with idiopathic epilepsy.
methodsNonrandomized, nonblinded prospective cohort study. Surgical complications, stimulation-related adverse effects, modifications to stimulator settings, number of hospital visits, and time to reach 1.5 mA stimulation current without intolerable adverse effects were described in dogs receiving current increases every 1 to 3 weeks (slow ramping) and dogs receiving current increases every 8 to 12 hours (fast ramping).
resultsSelf-resolving surgery site seromas formed in 6 dogs. No other surgical complications were observed. Fourteen dogs reached 1.5 mA. Coughing (11/14 dogs; 5 slow, 6 fast ramping) was the most common adverse effect. Intolerable coughing that limited current increases despite changing other stimulus parameters occurred in 6/7 of the fast-ramping group and in none of the slow-ramping group. Median time to 1.5 mA was 72 days (range, 28-98) in the slow-ramping group and 77 days (range, 3-152) in the fast-ramping group. Median number of clinic visits was 6 for the slow-ramping group (range, 5-6) and 3 for the fast-ramping group (range, 1-7). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Coughing is a common adverse effect of VNS in dogs and generally is well tolerated, particularly if current is increased slowly and other stimulation parameters are adapted for effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.