Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34472360›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Corticosteroid and Immunosuppressant Therapy for Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review.

Siavosh Fazelpour, Mouhannad M Sadek, Pablo B Nery, Rob S Beanlands, Niko Tzemos, Mustafa Toma, David H Birnie

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. AI-enabled CT-guided end-to-end quantification of total cardiac activity in 18FDG cardiac PET/CT for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Siavosh FazelpourArrhythmia Service Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Mouhannad M SadekArrhythmia Service Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Pablo B NeryArrhythmia Service Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Rob S BeanlandsDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine The National Cardiac PET Center University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Niko TzemosDivision of Cardiology London Health Sciences University of Western Ontario London Ontario Canada.
Mustafa TomaDivision of Cardiology St. Paul's Hospital University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0274-3962
David H BirnieArrhythmia Service Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6495-1428
University of Ottawa · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Corticosteroid therapy for the treatment of clinically manifest cardiac sarcoidosis is generally recommended. Our group previously systematically reviewed the data in 2013; since then, there has been increasing quality and quantity of data and also interest in nonsteroid agents. Methods and Results Studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov database. The quality of included articles was rated using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network 50. Outcomes examined were atrioventricular conduction, left ventricular function, ventricular arrhythmias, and mortality. A total of 3527 references were retrieved, and 34 publications met the inclusion criteria. There were no randomized trials, and only 2 studies were rated good quality. In the 34 reports (total of 1297 patients), 1125 patients received corticosteroids, 235 received additional or other immunosuppressant therapy, and 97 patients received no therapy. There were 178 patients treated for atrioventricular conduction disease, with 76/178 (42.7%) improving. In contrast, 21 patients were not treated with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressant therapy, and none of them improved. Therapy was associated with the prevention of deterioration in left ventricular function. A total of 8 publications reported on ventricular arrhythmia burden, and 19 reported on mortality; the data quality was too limited to draw conclusions for the latter 2 outcomes. Conclusions The best quality data relate to atrioventricular nodal conduction and left ventricular function recovery. In both situations, therapy with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressant therapy were sometimes associated with positive outcomes. The data quality is too limited to draw conclusions for ventricular arrhythmias and mortality.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesImmunosuppressive AgentsMyocarditisSarcoidosisArrhythmias, CardiacHumansAdrenal Cortex HormonesImmunosuppressive Agentscardiac sarcoidosiscorticosteroidsimmunosuppression

Identifiers

PMID34472360
PMCPMC8649244
OpenAlexW3198599525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.