Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34472221›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Clinical impact of follow-up imaging on mortality in Korean breast cancer patients: A national cohort study.

So-Youn Jung, Young Ae Kim, Dong-Eun Lee, Jungnam Joo, Joung Hwan Back, Sun-Young Kong, Eun Sook Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

So-Youn JungDepartment of Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4508-4522
Young Ae KimNational Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Korea.
Dong-Eun LeeBiostatistics Collaboration Team, Research Core Center, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jungnam JooOffice of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Joung Hwan BackHealth Insurance Policy Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, South Korea.
Sun-Young KongNational Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Korea.
Eun Sook LeeDepartment of Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1122-8230

Funding

National Cancer Center NCC-1911272National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea 1520240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the incidence of breast cancer has increased and the survival rate has improved, supporting the optimal follow-up strategy has become an important issue. This study aimed to evaluate follow-up imaging usage after breast cancer surgery and the implications on mortality in Korea.

methodsThis study included 96,575 breast cancer patients diagnosed during 2002-2010 and registered in the Korea Central Cancer Registry, Statistics Korea, and Korean National Health Insurance Service. We evaluated the frequency of breast imaging (mammography and breast MRI) and systemic imaging for evaluating the presence of distant metastasis (chest CT, bone scan, and PET-CT), and performed analyses to determine if they had an effect on mortality.

resultsThe median follow-up period was 72.9 months (range: 12.0-133.3) and 7.5% of the patients died. Among all patients, 54.7%, 16.2%, 45.6%, and 8.5% received 3 or more mammograms, chest CTs, bone scans, and PET-CTs within 3 years after surgery, respectively. Among patients who developed recurrence after 3 or more years, a comparison of overall mortality and breast-cancer specific mortality according to the frequency of imaging by modality (<3 vs. ≥3) showed that only mammography had significantly reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.84, p < 0.0001; HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.84; p < 0.0001).

conclusionsThis study showed that only frequent mammography reduced mortality and frequent imaging follow-up with other modalities did not when compared to less frequent imaging. This finding provides supportive evidence that clinicians need to adhere to the current guidelines for surveillance after breast cancer surgery.

Indexed as

AdultAftercareAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomographybreast cancerfollow-upimagesurgerysurveillancesurvivors

Identifiers

PMID34472221
PMCPMC8446413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.