ArticleCancer medicine2021
Clinical impact of follow-up imaging on mortality in Korean breast cancer patients: A national cohort study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiology Surveillance for Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Pooled it
- Ultra-late triple metastasis to the breast, lung, and brain 25 years after nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Surveillance for Distant Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent Contemporary Management: A Report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Survivor Research Group.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Intensive Surveillance for Women With Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Korea.Journal of breast cancer · 2024Article
- Tumor Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer Assessed with Computed Tomography Texture Analysis: Association with Disease-Free Survival and Clinicopathological Prognostic Factor.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Gender Differences and miRNAs Expression in Cancer: Implications on Prognosis and Susceptibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the incidence of breast cancer has increased and the survival rate has improved, supporting the optimal follow-up strategy has become an important issue. This study aimed to evaluate follow-up imaging usage after breast cancer surgery and the implications on mortality in Korea.
methodsThis study included 96,575 breast cancer patients diagnosed during 2002-2010 and registered in the Korea Central Cancer Registry, Statistics Korea, and Korean National Health Insurance Service. We evaluated the frequency of breast imaging (mammography and breast MRI) and systemic imaging for evaluating the presence of distant metastasis (chest CT, bone scan, and PET-CT), and performed analyses to determine if they had an effect on mortality.
resultsThe median follow-up period was 72.9 months (range: 12.0-133.3) and 7.5% of the patients died. Among all patients, 54.7%, 16.2%, 45.6%, and 8.5% received 3 or more mammograms, chest CTs, bone scans, and PET-CTs within 3 years after surgery, respectively. Among patients who developed recurrence after 3 or more years, a comparison of overall mortality and breast-cancer specific mortality according to the frequency of imaging by modality (<3 vs. ≥3) showed that only mammography had significantly reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.84, p < 0.0001; HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.84; p < 0.0001).
conclusionsThis study showed that only frequent mammography reduced mortality and frequent imaging follow-up with other modalities did not when compared to less frequent imaging. This finding provides supportive evidence that clinicians need to adhere to the current guidelines for surveillance after breast cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.