ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2022
Congenital heart defects and copy number variants associated with neurodevelopmental impairment.
Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complementary role of echocardiography, karyotyping, and chromosomal microarray in congenital cardiac anomalies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Genomic testing and molecular diagnosis among infants with congenital heart disease in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Observational
- Narrative review of single ventricle: where are we after 40 years?Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- DIO3 protects against thyrotoxicosis-derived cranio-encephalic and cardiac congenital abnormalities.JCI insight · 2022Article
- Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses Detected with Isolated Cardiovascular Malformation: A Multicenter Study, Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A genetic etiology is identifiable in 20%-30% of patients with congenital heart defects (CHD). Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) can detect copy number variants (CNV) associated with CHD. In previous studies, the diagnostic yield of postnatal CMA testing ranged from 4% to 28% in CHD patients. However, incidental pathogenic CNV and variants of unknown significance are often discovered without any known association with CHD. The study objective was to describe the rate of pathogenic CNV associated with neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) and compare clinical findings in CHD neonates with genetic results. A single-center retrospective review was performed on all consecutive newborns with CHD admitted to a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit from January 2013 to March 2019 (n = 525). CHD phenotypes were classified as per the National Birth Defect Prevention Study. CMA detected pathogenic CNV in 21.3% (61/287) of neonates, and karyotype or fluorescence in situ hybridization detected aneuploidies in an additional 11% of the overall cohort (58/525). Atrioventricular septal defects and conotruncal defects showed the highest diagnostic yield by CMA (28.6% and 27.2%, respectively). Among neonates with pathogenic CNV on CMA, 78.7% (48/61) were associated with NDI. Neonates with pathogenic CNV were smaller in length at birth compared to those with benign CNV or variants of unknown significance (p = 0.005) and were more likely to be discharged with an enteral feeding tube (p = 0.027). CMA can discover genetic variants associated with NDI and are common in neonates with CHD. Genetic testing in the neonatal period can heighten awareness of genetic risk for NDI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.