Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34472045›Full record

Observational studyAging clinical and experimental research2022

Implementing a multidisciplinary rapid geriatric observation unit for non-critical older patients referred to hospital: observational study on real-world data.

Antonio Nouvenne, Andrea Ticinesi, Nicoletta Cerundolo, Beatrice Prati, Alberto Parise, Giulia Chiussi, Laura Frosio, Angela Guerra, Ettore Brianti, Massimo Fabi and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio NouvenneGeriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Via Antonio Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Andrea TicinesiGeriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Via Antonio Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy. aticinesi@ao.pr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9171-8592
Nicoletta CerundoloGeriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Via Antonio Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Beatrice PratiGeriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Via Antonio Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Alberto PariseGeriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Via Antonio Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Giulia ChiussiGeriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Via Antonio Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Laura FrosioPost-Graduate Specialization Course in Emergency-Urgency Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Angela GuerraGeriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Via Antonio Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Ettore BriantiGeneral Management, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Massimo FabiGeneral Management, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Tiziana MeschiGeriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Via Antonio Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Ospedale di Parma · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeriatric rapid observation units may represent an alternative to hospitalization in older patients with non-critical acute illness.

aimsTo describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to a geriatric observation unit called URGe (Unità Geriatrica Rapida), implemented in an Italian hospital and characterized by multidisciplinary medical staff with geriatric expertise, fast-track access to diagnostic resources, regular use of point-of-care ultrasound and predicted length of stay (LOS) < 72 h.

methodsThe medical records of patients admitted to URGe during a 3-month period (452 subjects, 247 F and 205 M, median age 82 years, IQR 77-87) were retrospectively examined. The primary study endpoint was transferral from URGe to regular wards. Baseline covariates included demographics, comprehensive geriatric assessment, acute illnesses, comorbidities, vital signs and routine laboratory tests.

resultsDespite elevated burden of multimorbidity (median number of chronic diseases 4, IQR 2-5) and frailty (median Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale score 4, IQR 3-6), only 137 patients (30.3%) required transferral from URGe to regular wards. The main factors positively associated with this outcome were Rockwood score, fever, cancer and red cell distribution width (P < 0.05 on multivariate logistic regression model). The rate of complications (mortality, delirium, and falls) during URGe stay was low (0.5%, 7% and 2%, respectively). Overall duration of hospital stay was lower than that of a group of historical controls matched by age, sex, main diagnosis, multimorbidity and frailty.

conclusionsThe URGe model of acute geriatric care is feasible, safe and has the potential of reducing unnecessary hospitalizations of older patients.

Indexed as

Clinical Observation UnitsFrailtyAgedAged, 80 and overGeriatric AssessmentHospitalizationHospitalsHumansLength of StayRetrospective StudiesGeriatric emergency medicineObservation unitsOrganization of geriatric care

Identifiers

PMID34472045
OpenAlexW3197400375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.