Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471982›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2022

Efficacy and tolerability of a low-residue diet for bowel preparation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cristian Ahumada, Lisandro Pereyra, Martín Galvarini, José Mella, Estanislao Gómez, Silvia C Pedreira, Daniel G Cimmino

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristian AhumadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, German Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina. cahumada@hospitalaleman.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4640-7856
Lisandro PereyraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, German Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martín GalvariniDepartment of General Surgery, German Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
José MellaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, German Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Estanislao GómezDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, German Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Silvia C PedreiraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, German Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniel G CimminoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, German Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hospital César Milstein · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) contributes significantly to cancer mortality worldwide. In an effort to reduce the risk of death, detection of polyps through colonoscopy is crucial. The success of the colonoscopy depends on the diet administered the day before the test. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and adverse effects of bowel preparation when using a low-residual diet (LRD) compared to a clear-liquid diet (CLD) the day before a scheduled colonoscopy.

methodsPubMed/Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Scopus databases were searched. We included studies of patients undergoing a scheduled colonoscopy for CRC screening and surveillance or for diagnostic purposes that compared a LRD with a CLD the day before the colonoscopy. Efficacy, the primary outcome, was evaluated as the rate of adequate bowel preparation. Secondary outcomes were tolerability and adverse effects of bowel preparation.

resultsThirteen RCTs (N = 2587) were included. Patients receiving a LRD compared to a CLD showed no difference in adequate bowel preparations (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.99-1.05; I

conclusionBased on these findings, our recommendation is strong in favour of a LRD for bowel preparation of patients undergoing a scheduled colonoscopy. This diet could also be useful as a preoperative colonic preparation, but this requires further research.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyPreoperative CareCatharticsColonDietHumansPolyethylene GlycolsCatharticsPolyethylene GlycolsBowel preparationLow-residue dietMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID34471982
OpenAlexW3198083638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.