Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471970›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Evaluation of an oral sodium bicarbonate protocol for high-dose methotrexate urine alkalinization.

Rachel D Heisler, Jordan J Kelly, Sara Abedinzadegan Abdi, Jennifer L Hawker, Leanne G Fong, Janet L Quon, Josee Z Rioux, Jennifer C Jupp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel D HeislerPharmacy Services, University of Alberta Hospital/Stollery Children's Hospital/Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada. rachel.heisler2@ahs.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5577-8854
Jordan J KellyPharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8953-5252
Sara Abedinzadegan AbdiFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jennifer L HawkerPharmacy Services, Foothills Medical Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Leanne G FongPharmacy Services, Foothills Medical Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Janet L QuonPharmacy Services, Peter Lougheed Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Josee Z RiouxPharmacy Services, Peter Lougheed Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jennifer C JuppPharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5653-7312
Alberta Health Services · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Alberta Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntravenous (IV) sodium bicarbonate is considered standard therapy for high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) urine alkalinization. Due to a national IV sodium bicarbonate shortage, an oral (PO) sodium bicarbonate protocol was implemented by Alberta Health Services (AHS) for HDMTX urine alkalinization. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PO sodium bicarbonate protocol compared to IV sodium bicarbonate for HDMTX urine alkalinization.

methodsA retrospective chart review of adult patients who received HDMTX (> 500 mg/m

resultsA total of 84 and 78 HDMTX cycles were included in the IV and PO cohorts, respectively. No difference in time to methotrexate clearance was seen between the IV and PO cohorts, 91.6 (± 35.4) hours and 95.2 (± 44) hours respectively; p = 0.5. The proportion of HDMTX cycles that experienced a > 25% increase in serum creatinine was not statistically significant, IV protocol 12% and PO protocol 5%; p = 0.13. Nausea and emesis occurred more frequently in the PO cohort than the IV cohort, though rarely resulted in refused doses or change to alternate sodium bicarbonate formulations.

conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that the AHS PO sodium bicarbonate protocol was no different in time to methotrexate clearance or rates of increased serum creatinine when compared to IV sodium bicarbonate.

Indexed as

MethotrexateSodium BicarbonateAdministration, IntravenousAdultBicarbonatesHumansRetrospective StudiesBicarbonatesMethotrexateSodium BicarbonateHigh-dose methotrexateOralSodium bicarbonateSupportive careUrine alkalinization

Identifiers

PMID34471970
OpenAlexW3198787590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.