Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471965›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

Risk factors for developing anorectal dysfunction after anterior resection.

Kevin Afshari, Kenneth Smedh, Philippe Wagner, Abbas Chabok, Maziar Nikberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin AfshariColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery and Centre for Clinical Research of Uppsala University, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, 72189, Västerås, Sweden. kevin.afshari@regionvastmanland.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6663-5242
Kenneth SmedhColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery and Centre for Clinical Research of Uppsala University, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, 72189, Västerås, Sweden.
Philippe WagnerCentre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Hospital of Vastmanland Västerås, Västerås, Sweden.
Abbas ChabokColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery and Centre for Clinical Research of Uppsala University, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, 72189, Västerås, Sweden.
Maziar NikbergColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery and Centre for Clinical Research of Uppsala University, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, 72189, Västerås, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnterior resection (AR) may result in defecatory dysfunction and the cause is multifactorial. The aim was to explore if dysfunction could be related to the part of the colon used for anastomosis (sigmoid or descending) and to identify other possible risk factors for bowel dysfunction after AR.

methodsThis is a retrospective study based on prospectively registered data from a regional registry at the surgical department in Västmanland 1996-2019. Bowel function was registered at 1 year after AR or after stoma reversal. In total, 470 stage I-III rectal cancer patients had AR whereof 412 were included in this study.

resultsClustering was seen in 57%, incontinence 29%, urgency 22%, and evacuatory dysfunction 16%. The part of the colon used for anastomosis, level of vascular tie, and gender were not significantly associated with defecatory dysfunction. The higher the anastomotic level, the lower the risk of incontinence (OR 0.75; CI 0.63-0.90; p < 0.001) and clustering (OR 0.78; CI 0.67-0.90; p < 0.001). Compared with patients without a loop-ileostomy, an increased risk of clustering (OR 1.89; 1.08-3.31; p = 0.03), incontinence (OR 2.48; 1.29-4.77; p < 0.01), and urgency (OR 4.61; CI 2.02-10.60; p < 0.001) was seen after loop-ileostomy closure. Preoperative radiotherapy had a negative impact on continence and clustering seen mainly in the unadjusted analysis.

conclusionThe part of the colon used for anastomosis was not a significantly associated functional outcome after anterior resection. Low anastomotic level and having had a diverting ileostomy were independent risk factors associated with negative functional outcomes.

Indexed as

IleostomyRectal NeoplasmsAnastomosis, SurgicalHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnorectal dysfunctionAnterior resectionAnterior resection syndromeBowel disturbanceBowel dysfunctionFunctional bowel disturbanceFunctional outcome

Identifiers

PMID34471965
PMCPMC8589768
OpenAlexW3198180969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.