Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471774›Full record

ArticleACS omega2021

The Accessibility of the Cell Wall in Scots Pine (

Edita Garskaite, Sarah L Stoll, Fredrik Forsberg, Henrik Lycksam, Zivile Stankeviciute, Aivaras Kareiva, Alberto Quintana, Christopher J Jensen, Kai Liu, Dick Sandberg

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In Situ Synthesis of FeMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Edita GarskaiteWood Science and Engineering, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, Forskargatan 1, SE-931 87 Skellefteå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3283-9313
Sarah L StollChemistry Department, Georgetown University, 37th and O Streets NW, Washington, D.C. 20057, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7184-8672
Fredrik ForsbergFluid and Experimental Mechanics, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden.
Henrik LycksamFluid and Experimental Mechanics, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden.
Zivile StankeviciuteInstitute of Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Geosciences, Vilnius University, Naugarduko 24, Vilnius LT-03225, Lithuania.
Aivaras KareivaInstitute of Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Geosciences, Vilnius University, Naugarduko 24, Vilnius LT-03225, Lithuania.
Alberto QuintanaPhysics Department, Georgetown University, 37th and O Streets NW, Washington, D.C., 20057, United States.
Christopher J JensenPhysics Department, Georgetown University, 37th and O Streets NW, Washington, D.C., 20057, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7459-1841
Kai LiuPhysics Department, Georgetown University, 37th and O Streets NW, Washington, D.C., 20057, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9413-6782
Dick SandbergWood Science and Engineering, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, Forskargatan 1, SE-931 87 Skellefteå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work presents a rapid and facile way to access the cell wall of wood with magnetic nanoparticles (NPs), providing insights into a method of wood modification to prepare hybrid bio-based functional materials. Diffusion-driven infiltration into Scots pine (

Identifiers

PMID34471774
PMCPMC8388106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.