Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471622›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2021

New SMS Classification of Cochleovestibular Anomalies: Our Experience with 25 Cases of Type I Anomaly.

Mohnish Grover, Shivam Sharma, Sunil Samdani, Gaurav Gupta, Chappati Preetam, Kriti Gera, Jairaj Kumar Vaishnav, Mahendra Kumar Hada

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohnish GroverDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, S.M.S Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 India.
Shivam SharmaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, S.M.S Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 India.ORCID 0000-0002-5775-2874
Sunil SamdaniDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, S.M.S Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 India.
Gaurav GuptaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, S.P Medical College and Hospital, Bikaner, Rajasthan India.
Chappati PreetamDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Orissa India.
Kriti GeraS.M.S Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 India.
Jairaj Kumar VaishnavDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, RVRS Medical College and Hospital, Bhilwara, Rajasthan India.
Mahendra Kumar HadaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, S.M.S Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 India.
SMS Medical College · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INGandhi Medical College & Hospital · INSardar Patel Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study and analyse the radiological and surgical findings of 25 cochlear implantees with SMS type-I cochleovestibular malformation and to compare their outcomes in terms of hearing and speech gains pre- and post-operatively.

methodsRetrospective analysis of cochlear implanted candidates over a period of 8 year from 3 institutions was undertaken and 25 patients suffering from pre-lingual profound congenital sensori-neural hearing loss along with presence of SMS type I cochleovestibular malformation were studied. Pre-operative radiology, surgical difficulties and complication, and post-operative hearing and speech outcomes upto a period of 2 years, using IT-MAIS scores were noted. Statistical comparison pre- and post-implantation was done using Wilcoxon signed rank test and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsIn 25 cases, we encountered 2 posterior SCC dysplasia, 15 enlarged vestibular aqueducts (LVA), 2 dilated vestibules, 4 superior SCC dysplasia, 2 cases with both posterior and superior SCC dysplasia and of those 1 had a dilated vestibule also. Intra-operatively, CSF leak was observed in 10 patients. Complete electrode insertion and good electrical response (NRT) was detected in all. No facial nerve anomaly was encountered. IT-MAIS scores increased from a pre-operative mean of 4.32 to 34.56 two years post-operatively and this difference was found to be statistically significant.

conclusionOur experience with SMS Type I malformations show promising and motivating results with less chances of complications, similar to implant candidates with normal anatomy. The outcomes in this group of patients are definitely not affected by any malformations in semicircular canals, vestibule or vestibular aqueduct.

Identifiers

PMID34471622
PMCPMC8364613
OpenAlexW3130265081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.