Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471579›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Locked-In Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Long-Term Management and Prognosis.

Taras Halan, Juan Fernando Ortiz, Dinesh Reddy, Abbas Altamimi, Abimbola O Ajibowo, Stephanie P Fabara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Locked-in syndrome responding to endovascular treatment.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The vascular locked-in and locked-in-plus syndrome: A retrospective case series.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2023
    Article
  9. Locked-in syndrome revisited.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Taras HalanGeneral Medicine, Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, UKR.
Juan Fernando OrtizNeurology, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, ECU.
Dinesh ReddyNeurology, Mysore Medical College, Mysore, IND.
Abbas AltamimiEmergency Medicine, Amiri Hospital, Kuwait, KWT.
Abimbola O AjibowoInternal Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Stephanie P FabaraGeneral Medicine, Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, ECU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locked-in syndrome (LIS) is a neurological disorder in which there is damage to the ventral pons and caudal midbrain. An ischemic cause, such as basilar artery occlusion, can often lead to LIS. LIS has three subtypes: classical, partial, and total. There is loss of motion in the four extremities in classical LIS, loss of horizontal gaze, and aphasia. In partial LIS, the patient still has some motor function. Complete LIS has the worst outcome because patients cannot blink or have vertical gaze, thus rendering them incapable of communicating. Most cases of LIS occur due to ischemic infarcts. These patients require a great deal of physical rehabilitation to regain partial motor ability and a means to communicate. While the clinical features and pathophysiology are known, the prognosis and long-term treatment remain unknown. We conducted a systematic review using the Meta-Analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) protocol. We use an advanced PubMed strategy using the inclusion criteria of observational studies or clinical trials conducted in the last 20 years, written in English, and conducted on humans. We excluded systematic reviews, literature reviews, metanalysis, and studies that did not meet the outcomes of our objectives. The prognosis of LIS is not good, and most patients remain locked in, with poor quality of life, especially motor functions. Respiratory failure and depression are big comorbidities. In the acute setting, patients benefit from rapid intervention. The subacute treatment needs to manage aggressively to improve functional scores best. The long-term treatment focus is on the quality of life and managing comorbidities.

Indexed as

locked in syndromelong term carelong-term careprognosisstroke

Identifiers

PMID34471579
PMCPMC8402869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.