Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471570›Full record

ArticleGlobal advances in health and medicine2021

Incorporating Acupuncture Into American Healthcare: Initiating a Discussion on Implementation Science, the Status of the Field, and Stakeholder Considerations.

David W Miller, Eric J Roseen, Jennifer A M Stone, Paula Gardiner, Juli Olson, Shellie Rosen, Peter Wayne, Robert Davis, Remy Coeytaux, PCORI-SAR Stakeholder Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global advances in health and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David W MillerUniversity Hospitals, Connor Integrative Health Network, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
Eric J RoseenDepartment of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3240-6756
Jennifer A M StoneDepartment of Anesthesia, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Paula GardinerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Juli OlsonU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9592-457X
Shellie RosenCrane Herbs, Austin, Texas.
Peter WayneOsher Center for Integrative Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-3560
Robert DavisSociety for Acupuncture Research, Burlington, Vermont.
Remy CoeytauxCenter for Integrative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1542-9016
PCORI-SAR Stakeholder Group

Funding

Improving Access to Chiropractic Care for Low Back Pain in Underserved Primary Care Settings: Development and Evaluation of a Multi-level Implementation StrategyK23AT010487 · NCCIH · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROSEEN, ERIC J · 2019 to 2023
$839k
Mentoring and research in mind-body and integrative therapiesK24AT009282 · NCCIH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WAYNE, PETER MICHAEL · 2017 to 2021
$834k
NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT010487NCCIH NIH HHS K24 AT009282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe field of implementation science is the study of methods that promote the uptake of evidence-based interventions into healthcare policy and practice. While acupuncture has gained significant traction in the American healthcare landscape, its journey has been somewhat haphazard and non-linear.

methodsIn June 2019, a group of thirty diverse stakeholders was convened by the Society for Acupuncture Research with the support of a Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Eugene Washington Engagement Award. This group of stakeholders represented a diverse mix of patients, providers, academicians, researchers, funders, allied health professionals, insurers, association leaders, certification experts, and military program developers. The collective engaged in discussion that explored acupuncture's status in healthcare, including reflections on its safety, effectiveness, best practices, and the actual implementation of acupuncture as seen from diverse stakeholder viewpoints.

objectivesA primary goal was to consider how to utilize knowledge from the field of implementation science more systematically and intentionally to disseminate information about acupuncture and its research base, through application of methods known to implementation science. The group also considered novel challenges that acupuncture may present to known implementation processes.

findingsThis article summarizes the initial findings of this in-person meeting of stakeholders and the ongoing discussion among the subject matter experts who authored this report. The goal of this report is to catalyze greater conversation about how the field of implementation science might intersect with practice, access, research, and policymaking pertaining to acupuncture. Core concepts of implementation science and its relationship to acupuncture are introduced, and the case for acupuncture as an Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is established. The status of the field and current environment of acupuncture is examined, and the perspectives of four stakeholder groups--patients, two types of professional practitioners, and researchers--are explored in more detail.

Indexed as

acupunctureacupuncture researchimplementation and disseminationstakeholders

Identifiers

PMID34471570
PMCPMC8404666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.