Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471568›Full record

ReviewGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2021

Current Reconstruction Options in Periprosthetic Fractures Around the Knee.

Giorgio Cacciola, Fabio Mancino, Federico De Meo, Antongiulio Bruschetta, Ivan De Martino, Pietro Cavaliere

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. High rate of complications after operative fixation of open periprosthetic distal femur fractures.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giorgio CacciolaOrthopaedic Institute of Southern Italy "Franco Scalabrino," Messina, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7739-4819
Fabio MancinoDivision of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Studies, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Federico De MeoOrthopaedic Institute of Southern Italy "Franco Scalabrino," Messina, Italy.
Antongiulio BruschettaOrthopaedic Institute of Southern Italy "Franco Scalabrino," Messina, Italy.
Ivan De MartinoDivision of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Studies, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Pietro CavaliereOrthopaedic Institute of Southern Italy "Franco Scalabrino," Messina, Italy.
University of Messina · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic fractures are a rare complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the incidence of these fractures is growing after the increasing number of TKAs performed every year and the progressive aging of the population. In addition, the surgical treatment and peri-operative management of these complications are demanding, representing a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. SIGNIFICANCE: A thorough understanding of these fractures and a correct classification are necessary in order to select the most suitable surgical treatment. The aim of this review was to analyze the epidemiology, classification, diagnosis, surgical treatment, and outcomes of periprosthetic knee fractures in order to give an exhaustive overview.

resultsReduction and internal fixation with locking plates or intramedullary nails represents the preferred option in case of a stable prosthetic implant. Conversely, in case of loose tibial and/or femoral component, implant revision is mandatory. Conservative treatment is rarely indicated.

conclusionA deep understanding of the characteristics and patterns of periprosthetic knee fractures, and the determination of the stability of the prosthetic implant are necessary in order to establish the correct treatment.

Indexed as

knee fractureknee revisionperiprosthetic fracturereview

Identifiers

PMID34471568
PMCPMC8404675
OpenAlexW3198265934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.